Login

~~Solid Snake~~ · 04-09-2014, 08:56 PM

Clowney may be off the table.

Mack and Bridgewater should still be there.

Some were turned off by Teddy's Pro-day, but the tape don't lie.

Watkins....Nice, but WRs are a dime a dozen and this class is deep.

I don't want to trade down....

Glad I am not making these decisions.

hendershot · 04-09-2014, 09:44 PM

I get your point and feel the same way but I don't buy that Vic Ketchman "WRs are a dime a dozen" baloney. Jimmy Smith has been retired for years and the Jags have struggled mightily at the position ever since. Blackmon and Shorts have had mild success but they're still a far cry from the Thunder and Lightning days.

I think Watkins is gonna be a big time playmaker in the league. I'm leaning towards taking him if he's still there and Clowney's off the board.

<FONT size=3>The secret to surfing is don't do anything.</FONT>

FranTheMan-ziel · 04-09-2014, 10:24 PM

Bridgewaters tape is not as impressive as you think.

Quote:<div>
I rolled on the floor laughing, With all those missed reads in the pocket Manziel had to improvise. If he had just stuck to the play book (or just be Teddy Bridgewater) A&M would have been in the National Title hunt late

</div>
Trolls gonna troll. Wallbash

Shack Del Rio · 04-09-2014, 11:54 PM

Quote:I get your point and feel the same way but I don't buy that Vic Ketchman "WRs are a dime a dozen" baloney. Jimmy Smith has been retired for years and the Jags have struggled mightily at the position ever since. Blackmon and Shorts have had mild success but they're still a far cry from the Thunder and Lightning days.

I think Watkins is gonna be a big time playmaker in the league. I'm leaning towards taking him if he's still there and Clowney's off the board.

Why would we need someone like Watkins? We could just find the next Cortez Hankton, Kevin Elliott or Nate Hughes.

knarnn · 04-10-2014, 12:09 AM

Quote:Why would we need someone like Watkins? We could just find the next Cortez Hankton, Kevin Elliott or Nate Hughes.

So you compare first round talent to UDFA's? And there's no way to find an above average WR in rounds 2-7?

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

Dustin J Koch · 04-10-2014, 07:11 AM

I would be very happy with Clownley, Watkins, Mack, Manziel

I would not be too happy with Bridgewater

RicoTx · 04-10-2014, 07:40 AM

I'm starting to warm to the thought of Manziel. If nothing else, it will be exciting. Even if he goes down in flames.

BigJohn98 · 04-10-2014, 08:06 AM

Quote:Bridgewaters tape is not as impressive as you think.

Deacon · 04-10-2014, 10:38 AM

Clowney, Watkins, Mack. I want one of those. I want one because I feel like they are sure fire 'special' players. There are other players who I think are on the fringe of that plane, but they aren't locks in my eyes. Players like Anthony Barr, Justin Gilbert, and Eric Ebron may turn out to be special and may just turn out to be 'players'.

Now, I'm no math guy, but it seems like we will get one of the three sure fire guys, barring a trade. I like trades, but I worry that if we trade back too far we will put ourselves out of reach of having a special player on the roster. And I really, really want a special player on the roster.

I'm trying to make myself more informed and less opinionated.

Stop saying whatever stupid thing you're talking about and pay attention to all the interesting things I have to say!

Jinjo · 04-10-2014, 11:02 AM

We are picking Teddy. I can feel it in my bones.

JohnnyJaguar · 04-10-2014, 11:09 AM

Quote:We are picking Teddy. I can feel it in my bones.

What number and round?

I want 3 players. Clowney, Bridgewater, Manziel. Jaguars have the number 3 pick. Just give me one of those 3 at 3, and I'm happy.

My top 6 favorite posters on these boards

Deacon
Pirkster
Shack Del Rio
Haterade
Hurricane
Badger

BigJohn98 · 04-10-2014, 11:22 AM

Quote:We are picking Teddy. I can feel it in my bones.

Your opinion seems to change every week.

~~Draft_MAnZiel_GOTDAM!~~ · 04-10-2014, 11:37 AM

Teddy Bridgewater or Derek Carr will be Blaine Gabbert all over again.

Scared, lacking confidence, inevitably sucking. Bridgewater couldn't even keep from pissing his pants at a pro day practice.

GET MANZIEL UP IN HERE!!!! Then draft WR in RD 2. Time for the JAGS to MAKE a comeback!!!

pirkster · 04-10-2014, 01:30 PM

Quote:Bridgewaters tape is not as impressive as you think.

That was Mayock's reaction when he actually went back and turned it on.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Jinjo · 04-10-2014, 02:52 PM

Quote:Your opinion seems to change every week.

Ive actually never changed my opinion. I have wanted to draft Teddy since last season.

BigJohn98 · 04-10-2014, 05:02 PM

Quote:Ive actually never changed my opinion. I have wanted to draft Teddy since last season.

My mistake.

atburg · 04-10-2014, 05:20 PM

Quote:Clowney may be off the table.

Mack and Bridgewater should still be there.

Some were turned off by Teddy's Pro-day, but the tape don't lie.

Watkins....Nice, but WRs are a dime a dozen and this class is deep.

I don't want to trade down....

Glad I am not making these decisions.

It is a deep reciever class, however that begins after Watkins and Evans.

Cleatwood · 04-10-2014, 05:27 PM

I highly doubt it's Teddy. At this point, I would bet its Mack with Garropolo or Carr in round 2.

pirkster · 04-10-2014, 05:34 PM

Quote:I highly doubt it's Teddy. At this point, I would bet its Mack with Garropolo or Carr in round 2.

Everyone talks about "watching the tape." Well, here's a bombshell...

http://nfl.si.com/2014/04/09/jimmy-garop...nfl-draft/

If nothing else, certainly an interesting opinion.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."