http://nflmocks.com/2014/01/06/2014-nfl-...rm=content

 

 

 

I would hate this mock - Cleveland trades the Texans both of their #1's to jump 3 spots....and the Texans still get Manziel. 

 

That would suck. 

---

There is no reason the Texans would do it. They know the Browns need a quarterback too. Chances are very good, however, the Browns will trade with the Rams, whose support of Sam Bradford was reinforced here:

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000...e/sam-brad

 

If the Browns leapfrog us and pick Manziel, will we have to wait until Round 2 to pick a quarterback?

---

4 quarterbacks in a row?  I'm sorry, I can't take any mock seriously that does that.

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

4 quarterbacks in a row?  I'm sorry, I can't take any mock seriously that does that.

 

Especially this year with only one quarterback truly worth picking in the top five.

---

Great looking draft IMO. Not realistic, but we get bortles and the texans dont get teddy.

---

Great looking draft IMO. Not realistic, but we get bortles and the texans dont get teddy.

 

Why would you rather have Bortles than Bridgewater?

---

I'd rather have Teddy, and I keep thinking there's a reasonable chance he makes it to the #3 spot.

---

'02

I'd rather have Teddy, and I keep thinking there's a reasonable chance he makes it to the #3 spot.

I don't see the reasonable chance


The only way it happens is if Houston decide they have something in case Keenum in which case they go de/ot and they can't find a trade partner


Cleveland swops with st Louis which is the trade i.see waiting to.happen and are sold on another QB


Considering the number of QB needy teams in the top 8 t I cannot see Houston being unable to.trade if so inclined


I also cannot see Houston and their trade partner and Cleveland all overlooking Bridgewater as the consensus top QB in the class

---

Idiot me

---

I say we trade it to Cleveland for their #1s and take Watkins and Dennard.

---

Season Ticket holder since 2004.

 

        

I know I am in the minority, but I don't see Houston trading out of the 1-1 pick and risk a superior QB selection unless they can get a blockbuster RGIII-type deal. Moving down to 1-4 and picking up the later first just does not seem enough to give up QB1 for QB4 in this draft.

---

I made it to the Vikings trading up to two overall for Derek Carr, then I started laughing too hard to continue.

---

Especially this year with only one quarterback truly worth picking in the top five.

 

You say this based on something you heard someone say... right?

---

Fine with me, I like Bortles and don't think Manziel will be successful in the NFL  :thumbsup:

---

The browns are rebuilding. I feel like there is too much value in two first round picks to move up for any QB but Teddy who will be off the board likely. I doubt Cleveland trades either picks. If anyone trades up it will probably be for Clowney.

---

I made it to the Vikings trading up to two overall for Derek Carr, then I started laughing too hard to continue.

 

That one was pretty funny, wasn't it?? We can only hope someone would trade up to 2 with the intention of taking Carr. 

---

The browns are rebuilding. I feel like there is too much value in two first round picks to move up for any QB but Teddy who will be off the board likely. I doubt Cleveland trades either picks. If anyone trades up it will probably be for Clowney.

They've been rebuilding since the 90's.

---

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

4 QB's with the first 4 picks.  NEVER. GONNA. HAPPEN.  One of the stupidest mocks I've seen.

---

Am I the only one that hopes the Jags steer clear of Bortles (and Carr)??

---

Am I the only one that hopes the Jags steer clear of Bortles (and Carr)??

 

I'm totally with you on Carr. I wouldn't mind Bortles after a certain spot in the first round. Just don't want him at 3. It would be overdrafting him. Better value would still be on the board. 

---