Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Sounds more and more like he's Jedd's guy

#1

He can run, he can throw, and he is a leader. The Tebow comparisons are just plain stupid. He brings a whole nother dynamic to our offense. The other QB will go #1 overall to the Texans. The Rams can't afford another blown pick in round 1, so I hope they go with the top DE. And that leaves our guy ripe for the picking.


Jedd has talked highly of this kid as uf ge would pick him first even if we had the first overall pick.


Get ready Jaguar fans. We are about to be in the playoff hunt for the next 10 years.


After we get our QB, then where do we go in round 2?
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

You made an entire topic and did not name the guy you are talking about


[Image: mvp.avia8a99974486b2b89.md.png]
Reply

#3

Rumors saying Texans really like Keenum, i dont believe they go QB.. Anyways after jags select a qb i wanna see them go RB get Gurley..
Reply

#4

Quote:He can run, he can throw, and he is a leader. The Tebow comparisons are just plain stupid. He brings a whole nother dynamic to our offense. The other QB will go #1 overall to the Texans. The Rams can't afford another blown pick in round 1, so I hope they go with the top DE. And that leaves our guy ripe for the picking.


Jedd has talked highly of this kid as uf ge would pick him first even if we had the first overall pick.


Get ready Jaguar fans. We are about to be in the playoff hunt for the next 10 years.


After we get our QB, then where do we go in round 2?
 

Face value, it sounds like him and Manziel are a great fit. But there's one other person's opinion that counts...and that's Gus. One of Bradley's keys to winning (and one we heard often enough during our winning streak vs when we lost games): Take the ball (on defense), and protect the ball (on offense).

 

Manziel's tendency is to take chances in order to make the big play, from his scramble out of the pocket to his deep sideline throws and heaves off his runs. This will make him susceptible to fumbles and interceptions in the NFL. I don't know how this will translate in the pros, but its hard for me to imagine that a coach who wants their offense to protect the football would be so approving of this kind of approach.

 

From Gus (and likely Caldwell's perspective given his pro career involved him in the drafting of Manning and Ryan), the better fit would be Bridgewater.

Reply

#5

Quote:Face value, it sounds like him and Manziel are a great fit. But there's one other person's opinion that counts...and that's Gus. One of Bradley's keys to winning (and one we heard often enough during our winning streak vs when we lost games): Take the ball (on defense), and protect the ball (on offense).


Manziel's tendency is to take chances in order to make the big play, from his scramble out of the pocket to his deep sideline throws and heaves off his runs. This will make him susceptible to fumbles and interceptions in the NFL. I don't know how this will translate in the pros, but its hard for me to imagine that a coach who wants their offense to protect the football would be so approving of this kind of approach.


From Gus (and likely Caldwell's perspective given his pro career involved him in the drafting of Manning and Ryan), the better fit would be Bridgewater.


Fully agree with everything you said.


Do you think Bradley and company could clean those things up? Seems fixable.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

[Image: team-america-puke-o.gif]

 


First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif
Reply

#7
(This post was last modified: 01-10-2014, 09:20 AM by Jungle Cat.)

Quote:Face value, it sounds like him and Manziel are a great fit. But there's one other person's opinion that counts...and that's Gus. One of Bradley's keys to winning (and one we heard often enough during our winning streak vs when we lost games): Take the ball (on defense), and protect the ball (on offense).

 

Manziel's tendency is to take chances in order to make the big play, from his scramble out of the pocket to his deep sideline throws and heaves off his runs. This will make him susceptible to fumbles and interceptions in the NFL. I don't know how this will translate in the pros, but its hard for me to imagine that a coach who wants their offense to protect the football would be so approving of this kind of approach.

 

From Gus (and likely Caldwell's perspective given his pro career involved him in the drafting of Manning and Ryan), the better fit would be Bridgewater.
 

A few snaps into his career and he's broken, out for the season because he's puny...then what do you think about drafting an elite offensive tackle with the third pick?

 

It's too late. So sorry.

 

We kill quarterbacks.


First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif
Reply

#8

Who's the OP talking about? I can more or less guess from context, but I find it funny that he never named anyone.


Reply

#9
(This post was last modified: 01-10-2014, 09:29 AM by SpeedyG.)

Quote:Fully agree with everything you said.


Do you think Bradley and company could clean those things up? Seems fixable.
 

I'm torn on Manziel. Like I said, his deep sideline throws are so pretty, and often he hits his WR in stride. With even stats backing up how accurate he is on 20+ throws, its hard to say its just pure luck. As far as "fixing" him, do you want to? Part of the intrigue in drafting Manziel is the magic that he brings to the table. To ask him to curtail that would make him more ordinary. I think if you take him, you take him for who he is.

 

You fix a bit of his footwork, teach him pro-style offense and reading coverages, but you don't chain him to the pocket.

 

You'd live and die with his play style.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Jedd's guy (Keenum) reminds me of Tebow.


Reply

#11

Quote:Who's the OP talking about? I can more or less guess from context, but I find it funny that he never named anyone.


It stimulates the mind.
Reply

#12

Quote:Rumors saying Texans really like Keenum, i dont believe they go QB.. Anyways after jags select a qb i wanna see them go RB get Gurley..
 

The Texans are not going with Keenum as a full time starter next year unless injury to whatever QB the main guy is. Keenum is horrible. 

Reply

#13

Please Houston start Case Keenum. Please.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:Please Houston start Case Keenum. Please.
 

I know,..right??? 

Reply

#15

Excited.


Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

#16

I think with Bridgewater, there is more of an expectation to be elite, and if he isn't, it will really hurt our franchise.

 

With Manziel, the fact that people don't know what to expect, and his potential tremendous upside make him being not as good as expect not as bad as if Bridgewater is a bust.

 

Just my opinion.


Reply

#17

Quote:Excited.
 

Gullible, if you believe that crap. You watched Keenum this year.....he stinks. You know it, we know it, O Brien knows it. He's not going to be the full time starter for them next year. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:Gullible, if you believe that crap. You watched Keenum this year.....he stinks. You know it, we know it, O Brien knows it. He's not going to be the full time starter for them next year. 
I'm excited for the future of this team, TMD. Jesus.

Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply

#19
(This post was last modified: 01-10-2014, 10:59 AM by The Mad Dog.)

Quote:I'm excited for the future of this team, TMD. Jesus.
 

Well, considering you quoted nothing and were vague in the post, the obvious assumption was that you were referring to what was most recently posted (being the Keenum stuff reported by "Yo Boy". and subsequent posts by RedSky & me on that topic )

 

As for your post?.....I'll start to get excited for the team when its warranted. 


Reply

#20

Quote:I think with Bridgewater, there is more of an expectation to be elite, and if he isn't, it will really hurt our franchise.

 

With Manziel, the fact that people don't know what to expect, and his potential tremendous upside make him being not as good as expect not as bad as if Bridgewater is a bust.

 

Just my opinion.
 

I think if you use that pick and miss, it doesn't really matter who you took; you missed and it hurts just as badly for the team.


Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!