The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Marks, Poz, others voted among best in division
|
http://espn.go.com/blog/jacksonville-jag...le-jaguars
Quote:The Jaguars may not have had anyone voted to the Pro Bowl, but the team is pretty well represented on the All-AFC South team. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Todman? What?
Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes. <div> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown. </div>
Quote:Todman? What?As a KR specialist - not a RB. He finished 3rd in the NFL in kick return avg. (25.9 yds)
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Kick returning isn't what it used to beSad but true. And now they want to do away with it altogether. Quote:As a KR specialist - not a RB. He finished 3rd in the NFL in kick return avg. (25.9 yds)Gotcha. Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes. <div> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown. </div> Quote:Thats impossible. You honestly think that entering the season we didnt have the worst roster in the league? Only comparable team was Oakland... We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
This is good for the team. Poz, Marks, and Scobee were all rock solid throughout the season. Hayes and Toddman both showed significant improvement as the season progressed. With so much young talent on the roster, that list should grow next year.
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Quote:Thats impossible. Can you take a week off or something? You are much better in very small doses. Quote:You honestly think that entering the season we didnt have the worst roster in the league? Only comparable team was Oakland...He'll believe whatever suits his schtick. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Quote:You honestly think that entering the season we didnt have the worst roster in the league? Only comparable team was Oakland... He knows that - but it doesn't support his latest whine-fest campaign of bashing the Jags' coaches. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
The Jags roster was bottom 5 of the league bad, but never "worst of all time" bad, which indeed was floated out there a lot on this board while we were winless this season.
People just want to create the angle that provides excuses. Quote:The Jags roster was bottom 5 of the league bad, but never "worst of all time" bad, which indeed was floated out there a lot on this board while we were winless this season. There was no angle created. They were losing at a historic pace. That isn't an excuse, that happened.
Quote:There was no angle created. They were losing at a historic pace. That isn't an excuse, that happened. They were losing at a historic pace partly because of strength of schedule in the 1st half. Few either deciphered that or instead preferred to use the opportunity to create excuses and exaggerate downward the actual level of the roster for excuse purposes. The roster was never "worst of all time" bad. Bottom 5 in NFL? Reasonable. Quote:The Jags roster was bottom 5 of the league bad, but never "worst of all time" bad, which indeed was floated out there a lot on this board while we were winless this season.You do grasp that it wasn't the board floating this notion, but prominent national analysts, right? Nobody here was trying to create an angle for excuses. That's just more pathetic nonsense from you. This team wasn't just losing games in the first half of the year. They were losing them in historic fashion, which is why the team was being tagged with the "worst" label. Of course, the tune changed when they finally started to show signs of significant improvement against a pushover Denver team at Mile High. Naturally, you'll chalk their improved play there up to Denver looking past the Jaguars and not attribute credit where it's due. Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
LOL at this idiot. The roster was bottom 5 bad - but it's all the coordinators' fault. LOL.
Quote:They were losing at a historic pace partly because of strength of schedule in the 1st half. Few either deciphered that or instead preferred to use the opportunity to create excuses and exaggerate downward the actual level of the roster for excuse purposes.But a good coordinator could have gotten so much more out of them right? :teehee: Quote:Thats impossible.lulz Really kid? You're pathetic. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.