Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Hawking invites you to his party. It's in 2009.

#1

Bring your time machine.


http://www.uproxx.com/technology/2013/12...y-in-2009/
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Been that,  done there.


Reply

#3

Again?  Really?  I mean I've been three times already.  And that's just counting this year.  

 

I mean I know time is wibbly wobbly timey wimey, but you're risking a paradox eventually!  And that's not good.

 

Oh well.  To the TARDIS!


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#4

Going forward in time I get. Going back in time is impossible.


Reply

#5

Quote:Going forward in time I get. Going back in time is impossible.
 

Only if you accept the argument that time is on a single continuous dimension.

 

If you accept the argument that time moves vertically between dimensions of repetition then you could theoretically go back and forward in time. 

 

IE this conversation is the only conversation me and you will have over and over again for all of eternity, the next day, minute, second is in a different dimension that our conscience has moved into and our conscience continues to move into a different dimension every second, day, minute, hour whatever.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2013, 03:00 PM by The Eleventh Doctor.)

Quote:Only if you accept the argument that time is on a single continuous dimension.

 

If you accept the argument that time moves vertically between dimensions of repetition then you could theoretically go back and forward in time. 

 

IE this conversation is the only conversation me and you will have over and over again for all of eternity, the next day, minute, second is in a different dimension that our conscience has moved into and our conscience continues to move into a different dimension every second, day, minute, hour whatever.
 

People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey stuff. 


I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 
Reply

#7

Quote:Only if you accept the argument that time is on a single continuous dimension.

 

If you accept the argument that time moves vertically between dimensions of repetition then you could theoretically go back and forward in time. 

 

IE this conversation is the only conversation me and you will have over and over again for all of eternity, the next day, minute, second is in a different dimension that our conscience has moved into and our conscience continues to move into a different dimension every second, day, minute, hour whatever.

Deja Vu, man. Tongue


What you're saying makes a lot of sense though. It's kind of similar (vaguely, really) to the idea of the quantum multiverse where every possible outcome is an outcome in a different universe.

Reply

#8

Quote:Deja Vu, man. Tongue


What you're saying makes a lot of sense though. It's kind of similar (vaguely, really) to the idea of the quantum multiverse where every possible outcome is an outcome in a different universe.
 

I love the idea of quantum physics, I'm just to old and to busy to have the time to really study it. My goal one day after all my kids are grown and I have time is to take as many physics classes at a college as they'll let me. The theory just fascinates my imagination!

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#9

Quote:I love the idea of quantum physics, I'm just to old and to busy to have the time to really study it. My goal one day after all my kids are grown and I have time is to take as many physics classes at a college as they'll let me. The theory just fascinates my imagination!
 

Same! I'm a bigger fan of programming though, so I'm following that path instead. I really enjoy science though and with quantum theory being something that is still largely in the works it makes that particular field even more interesting even if it ultimately turns out to be incorrect.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!