http://www.gogamecocks.com/2013/11/06/46...after.html

 

Junior defensive tackle Kelcy Quarles will enter the NFL Draft after this season, his father Buddy told The State on Wednesday.

 

 

Could he possibly go higher than Clowney?

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

Article says first three rds

---

 

Could he possibly go higher than Clowney?

 

Now that you mention it...no

---

;

;

 

 

Could he possibly go higher than Clowney?

 

No, but pending on the amount of narcotics someone ingested they might think that that is a possibility. 

---

 

Could he possibly go higher than Clowney?

 

You're joking right?

 

I like Quarles, but he's likely a round 2-3 guy.  Not top 2-3 overall guy, like Clowney.

---

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.gogamecocks.com/2013/11/06/462215/kelcy-quarles-will-turn-pro-after.html'>http://www.gogamecocks.com/2013/11/06/462215/kelcy-quarles-will-turn-pro-after.html</a>


Junior defensive tackle Kelcy Quarles will enter the NFL Draft after this season, his father Buddy told The State on Wednesday.



Could he possibly go higher than Clowney?

Quarles is good, but higher than clowney? Are you kidding? Please tell me your kidding..

---

Shock the world

Second round for sure. Late second......

---

LOVE THEM JAGUARS!

Clowney isn't very good. He made his mark with a single tackle in last year's bowl game.

 

Explain this.....

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb-8ePTyOnQ#t=239

 

There's no sugar-coating it.

 

Plus, the old ball coach factor.

 

You'd be crazy to deliberately draft Derrick Harvey 2.0. We've got a stack of almost a sack guys.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

Quarles compares to Warren Sapp in his prime. He should be the ranked as the first or second DT in this draft.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

Clowney isn't very good. He made his mark with a single tackle in last year's bowl game.

 

Explain this.....

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb-8ePTyOnQ#t=239

 

There's no sugar-coating it.

 

Plus, the old ball coach factor.

 

You'd be crazy to deliberately draft Derrick Harvey 2.0

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soXMCkoWfQo

---

Clowney isn't very good. He made his mark with a single tackle in last year's bowl game.

 

Explain this.....

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb-8ePTyOnQ#t=239

 

There's no sugar-coating it.

 

Plus, the old ball coach factor.

 

You'd be crazy to deliberately draft Derrick Harvey 2.0. We've got a stack of almost a sack guys.

 

That still doesn't change the fact that Clowney will be a top three pick and Quarles wont even sniff the first round.  That's the point.

---

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soXMCkoWfQo

So you counter with a false dilemma. In other words, if you disagree with us, you smoke crack.

 

I got that right?

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

So you counter with a false dilemma. In other words, if you disagree with us, you smoke crack.

 

I got that right?

 

Yeah, pretty much.

---

Clowney isn't very good. He made his mark with a single tackle in last year's bowl game.

 

Explain this.....

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb-8ePTyOnQ#t=239

 

There's no sugar-coating it.

 

Plus, the old ball coach factor.

 

You'd be crazy to deliberately draft Derrick Harvey 2.0. We've got a stack of almost a sack guys.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000...ajor-issue

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000...ast-decade

 

youre welcome.

---

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000...ajor-issue

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000...ast-decade

 

youre welcome.

For what?

 

When I see a coach with the proven track record of Stever Spurrier addressing the media holding a piece of paper, essentially looking like a downed US pilot making a confession on Vietnam TV, I smell a rat.

 

Ultimately, nobody has cared to view the video and provide any kind of fair evaluation. 

 

That's because the video indicates that Quarles is, indeed, much better at his position than Clowney is at his.

 

Five NFL executives? Well, let's see how some of these pump and dump college football "beast" defenders are doing....

 

Melvin Ingram? 1.5 sacks in 24 games. Dion Jordan? One sack as a sub within the last two minutes of the half versus Cleveland in September. Jarvis Jones? One sack as a sub in November versus Buffalo on second and more than eight.

 

And Quarles is just one of the out-of-focus guys on the tee shirt.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

For what?

 

When I see a coach with the proven track record of Stever Spurrier addressing the media holding a piece of paper, essentially looking like a downed US pilot making a confession on Vietnam TV, I smell a rat.

 

Ultimately, nobody has cared to view the video and provide any kind of fair evaluation. 

 

That's because the video indicates that Quarles is, indeed, much better at his position than Clowney is at his.

 

Five NFL executives? Well, let's see how some of these pump and dump college football "beast" defenders are doing....

 

Melvin Ingram? 1.5 sacks in 24 games. Dion Jordan? One sack as a sub within the last two minutes of the half versus Cleveland in September. Jarvis Jones? One sack as a sub in November versus Buffalo on second and more than eight.

 

And Quarles is just one of the out-of-focus guys on the tee shirt.

Lol. LOL. LOOOL. LOOOOOOL.

 

Just stop. You look stupid. We shouldn't even have to explain this to you.

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

Lol. LOL. LOOOL. LOOOOOOL.

 

Just stop. You look stupid. We shouldn't even have to explain this to you.

Actually, you should. There's no reason whatsoever to keep harping and harping about Clowney. He's not as advertised. He is not productive.

 

The video provides direct visual evidence that Clowney is over-rated.

 

I assure you, it's not just me.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

Clowney's draft stock is going to tumble due to this season.

 

I don't care what some supposed execs had to say, his lack of production this season is a serious red flag. And trust me, teams will take note.

---

Actually, you should. There's no reason whatsoever to keep harping and harping about Clowney. He's not as advertised. He is not productive.

 

The video provides direct visual evidence that Clowney is over-rated.

 

I assure you, it's not just me.

So I guess last season Clowney was good at his position? Since we're going by "production " and statistics, and all.

 

I suppose somehow his talent level dropped over the course of a summer. Weird, I didn't know that could happen.

 

And I guess Jarvis Jones actually IS a very good pass rusher. Because he posted phenomenal numbers at UGA and his production was his best factor coming out of college. And that success has really translated to the pros, hasn't it?

 

You know what, I like your argument. Let's stop evaluating intangibles and talent, and stick with straight statistics.

 

On that note... Tyler Bray 2013.

---

"Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other." Galatians 5:26

2015 NFL Draft - Analyzing Targets www.jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/topic/7892-2015-nfl-draft-analyzing-targets/

Actually, you should. There's no reason whatsoever to keep harping and harping about Clowney. He's not as advertised. He is not productive.

 

The video provides direct visual evidence that Clowney is over-rated.

 

I assure you, it's not just me.

 

Disruption is production my friend, you can't measure Clowney's impact on stats alone, he's a disruptive force on the defensive line and makes everyone around him better. If his motor consistently runs high he'll have a chance to be one of the best Defensive Lineman in the history of the NFL.

---