Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Stadium Vote A Sign of the Future?

#41
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2013, 10:36 PM by The_Anchorman.)

Quote:#1.  Reducing supply does not increase demand.

 

#2 Reducing the price of a season ticket does. On top of that,

 

#3 the London game is essentially guaranteed income for the Jaguars,

 

#4 it's money flowing into the Jacksonville economy without the local populace having to lift a single finger.
 

 

You are correct in regards to #1.

 

You are incorrect in regards to #2.  Season ticket prices did not decrease.  The fact that STHs lost ONE (1) regular season home game does not offset the decrease in the price.  You forgot to recognize the fair market value of a season ticket that has ONE (1) less regular season home game.  In essence, the Fair Market Value (FMV) of a Jacksonville STH has dropped.  This creates an inverse reconciliation between what the seller provides versus what the buyer receives.  Thus its an actual increase in ticket prices that will result in less demand by the consumer----  In other words, as a consumer in Jackonsville, why would I pay more for season tickets, at face value, when 1 of those home games will not be able to be attended?  The demand curve thus slides to the left...  Quantity is reduced and price is increased....

 

#3, as a consumer, I don't care what it means to Khan as the owner of the Jaguars.  I'm a Jacksonville Jaguars fan.  He's the owner.  He's doing just fine without trying to figure out how to increase revenue outside the traditional methods.  To me, it seems we praise business men like gods.  Please spare me.  Anyone with a billion dollars isn't going to get my respect by jacking regular consumers. 

 

 

#4 is completely incorrect.  Basic micro economics proves that revenue spent outside Jacksonville does not create any additional revenue for the populace of Jacksonville.  All the revenue from Jacksonville that could have happened by concessions, parking, scalping, supermaket sales for tailgating, ETC is LOST by having the game outside Jacksonville.  You're completely losing the micro economic cascade of having the game in Jacksonville.  To think otherwise is naive. 

 

Sure Khan gets benefit.  But to think it helps Jacksonville consumers, citizens, fans, and STH's is completely inaccurate.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!