Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Geno.


man they need to bench him if they wanna make the playoffs, he just aint getting it done.  is garrard still on the team? itd be cool to see him lead that team to the playoffs.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Like I said as bad as Gabbert is I'd rather have him then Geno. At least for a season Gabbert seemed like he had potential, Geno is just sucking right out the gate.


[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Quote:Like I said as bad as Gabbert is I'd rather have him then Geno. At least for a season Gabbert seemed like he had potential, Geno is just sucking right out the gate.


I disagree with this. These past 4(?) weeks have been horrible for Geno but he has at least shown in previous games he can be good. Geno has had some pretty good games this year.
Reply


Geno is just throwing the ball around recklessly

Reply


Quote:Geno is just throwing the ball around recklessly
 

To me that's a bigger problem then almost anything, you can't build a  team around a QB that is careless with the ball.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



While Geno Smith could noticeably improve with more experience and a much better Offensive supporting cast,  the way the Jets are built at present,  they would be better off with a game manager at QB.    Someone who can do just enough to give their Defense a chance to be the difference in games.   A huge mistake by the Jets is they didn't bring that type of # 2 QB into their fold.



Reply

(This post was last modified: 12-01-2013, 06:08 PM by flgatorsandjags.)

4-10 29yds.  1INT   Benched

 

Lol at the people that wanted this guy. 


Reply


Quote:Looked pretty good past game. 16/29, 331 yds , 2 TDs, 2 INTs. 

 

Still think he would beat out ole Gabbert....oh well. 

 

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2013092205...e=boxscore
 

 

Quote:4-10 29yds.  1INT   Benched

 

Lol at the people that wanted this guy. 
QFT!

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 




Reply


Quote:To me that's a bigger problem then almost anything, you can't build a team around a QB that is careless with the ball.


Signed the NFL's all time INT leader and future Hall of Famer,


Brett Farve
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



lol geno. start garrard!!


Reply


Quote:Signed the NFL's all time INT leader and future Hall of Famer,


Brett Farve
 

You're comparing Geno and Farve................... :blink:

 

There's a difference in being careless with the ball and taking chances that lead to turnovers, Geno is careless

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Quote:4-10 29yds.  1INT   Benched

 

Lol at the people that wanted this guy. 
 

no, no people that didn't want him where bias Rolleyes

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Quote:Weird. I was trashed when I said Geno would be successful.
 

You where saying Tommy?

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Geno throwing another INT. Thanks God, Caldwell didn't listen all the experts on this board...


Reply


Have to admit that he is playing well today. But good Gob, Oakland's defense is awful.


Reply


Gabbert looked good sometimes, too.


Reply


[Image: 1264091579_kirk_rofl.gif]


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Quote:You where saying Tommy?
He's not going to answer you. If he does, he will just call you a racist, or something moronic like that. It's all he has the mental capacity for.

What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.







 




Reply


Quote:You where saying Tommy?

So he's had a couple bad games. Does that mean you automatically discredit the success he had this season? Where were you when he was winning games? Oh, that's right.
Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply


Quote:He's not going to answer you. If he does, he will just call you a racist, or something moronic like that. It's all he has the mental capacity for.

Keep sidepicking your posts. It's not like you have anything intelligent to say anyway.
Quote:I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!