Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
*** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD ***

(This post was last modified: 12-26-2019, 04:13 PM by mikesez.)

(12-26-2019, 03:38 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote:
(12-26-2019, 12:49 PM)mikesez Wrote: The "existential threat" and "security risk" is the possibility of foreign interference in the coming election in November 2020.
The threat is not immediate. As long as Nancy doesn't wait too much longer, she's at least not a hypocrite.
now you may think the threat that she's talking about is not real in the first place, but she's at least not contradicting herself.

Maybe you can explain how the man tasked to faithfully execute the law, asking for cooperation in a criminal matter, under the terms of an international treaty signed by the US Senate, is interfering with our election?  Does running for office grant Biden some special immunity?  It didn't seem to prevent the Obama administration from investigating Trump.  Will the House Dems impeach Obama now?

I've explained it many times in these threads.  Short answer - your leading questions include false precepts.

(12-26-2019, 03:09 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(12-26-2019, 02:42 PM)mikesez Wrote: She shouldn't have said that she would wait for bipartisan support. Just like when Obama wanted bipartisan support for Obamacare, it is reverse psychology.  The Republican leadership says, "hey guys we can call them hypocrites if we just close ranks!" And then the conversation is about who's a hypocrite and who's partisan and it's not at all about the thing that they're actually voting on anymore... Sad!

So, do you retract your statement claiming Pelosi isn't a hypocrite?

She's not a hypocrite for withholding the articles.
For proceeding without bipartisan support on the question of impeachment, you could call that hypocrisy, or you could call that changing her mind.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: *** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD *** - by mikesez - 12-26-2019, 04:11 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-28-2019, 01:59 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-16-2020, 08:21 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-21-2020, 04:06 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 01-21-2020, 04:18 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-22-2020, 01:29 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by StroudCrowd1 - 01-22-2020, 01:32 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:37 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:43 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 02:18 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by flsprtsgod - 01-23-2020, 03:42 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-24-2020, 12:58 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-30-2020, 02:47 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-18-2019, 01:57 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!