Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
*** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD ***

(This post was last modified: 12-28-2019, 08:30 PM by mikesez.)

(12-28-2019, 06:58 PM)Last42min Wrote:
(12-28-2019, 10:43 AM)mikesez Wrote: Nazi is a state of mind, not an ideology. Socialism or communism are ideologies.  A Nazi doesn't care about how much of the economy is under the government's control. A Nazi just wants all government power to be invested in a strong dictator, and he will call you unpatriotic or worse if you dare say anything bad about the leader, and God help if you're not the same religion or ethnicity as the leader..

This is hilarious.

What's your opinion on how Nazism fits in a political spectrum? Did I say anything false? Is your  view informed by facts? Have you ever done a comparative study of how Lenin dealt with, say, labor unions, compared to how Hitler dealt with them?

(12-28-2019, 07:24 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(12-28-2019, 04:31 PM)mikesez Wrote: Rational words sound bizarre to bizarre people.

The prosecution goes first.
After the prosecution rests, the defense has its turn.
Does that sound rational or bizarre to you?

I hope it was rational because the next part is like it but just a little more complicated... If the people subpoenaed by the prosecution show up to answer questions under oath, the people subpoenaed by the defense should do the same.
However, if the prosecution does not get a fair response to its subpoenas, neither should the defense.

So, practically, Biden has no obligation to respond if Bolton and Mulvaney and Pompeo do not respond.

Round and round we go. Biden does not have Executive Privilege as does Trump. It will be great to watch Trump destroy him at the debates over this.

Executive privilege means whatever five justices on the supreme Court says it means. And I don't think they'll agree with your definition, or with Trump's.

(12-28-2019, 07:47 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote:
(12-28-2019, 04:31 PM)mikesez Wrote: Rational words sound bizarre to bizarre people.

The prosecution goes first.
After the prosecution rests, the defense has its turn.
Does that sound rational or bizarre to you?

I hope it was rational because the next part is like it but just a little more complicated... If the people subpoenaed by the prosecution show up to answer questions under oath, the people subpoenaed by the defense should do the same.
However, if the prosecution does not get a fair response to its subpoenas, neither should the defense.

So, practically, Biden has no obligation to respond if Bolton and Mulvaney and Pompeo do not respond.

By your logic, the Senate should hold a secret trial in the basement and drive a false narrative through selective leaks.

If you don't think Senators are discussing their next move behind closed doors right now, I suggest that's naive.

The House did discuss Trump/Ukraine behind closed doors.  Then they held public hearings.  Then they voted.  The Senate is basically going to do the same thing. They will cycle between closed and open door meetings,, until they finally vote on the articles.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-28-2019, 01:59 PM
RE: *** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD *** - by mikesez - 12-28-2019, 08:26 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-16-2020, 08:21 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-21-2020, 04:06 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 01-21-2020, 04:18 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-22-2020, 01:29 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by StroudCrowd1 - 01-22-2020, 01:32 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:37 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:43 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 02:18 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by flsprtsgod - 01-23-2020, 03:42 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-24-2020, 12:58 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-30-2020, 02:47 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-18-2019, 01:57 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!