The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
*** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD ***
|
(01-21-2020, 09:09 PM)Byron LeftTownTjagibelieve Wrote:(01-21-2020, 05:46 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the "whistle-blower" confirmed to have been reporting second hand information? If I recall correctly, the "whistle-blower" wasn't even in on the call. Burisma was paying graft dollars to the son of the leading candidate of the Democrat party, thus making Joe susceptible to bribery if he were elected - a legitimate interest of Trump. Someone cooked up the whistleblower angle to redirect attention away from that. It's working, for now. Or until the election makes it irrelevant. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.