(01-22-2020, 01:17 PM)jj82284 Wrote:

(01-22-2020, 11:11 AM)Gabe Wrote: Exactly why I'm in favor of witness testimony, OMB docs and White House docs. Evidence that may or may not prove guilt, but evidence nonetheless.

Yeh.  To heck with executive privilege, due process, presumption of innocence.  Let's just keep digging until we find something.  Let's ignore the clearly exculpatory statements by the alleged targets of extortion or the clear evidence that joe biden acted corruptly....  


Notice how this zeal for investigations never extends to the left?

Notice my bold statement? I can underline it for you if you like. Regardless, I appreciate the deflections, JJ.

My approach: There's a smoking gun...hell, lots of smoking guns - so you dig for information. Evidence roots it all out. Why withhold if you're clearly innocent? Trump's words in Davos this morning, taking a pre-victory victory lap didn't help: "They (democrats) don't have any material, we (republicans) have all the material." 

If there's clear evidence the WH has that Biden acted corruptly, I'd love to see that too - I've gone on record saying that I don't care for Biden, nor do I trust his leadership. FOIA seems to be getting things in piecemeal, so that's a start. It helps paint a clearer picture so nobody needs a time turner

I'll ask again: what legitimate reason does the White House have for not releasing OMB docs and/or blocking witness testimony? What legitimate reason does the Senate have for not wanting to see/hear that evidence? Both were requested in House proceedings, but the withholding only added to the passing of the 2nd article (obstruction of congress). These aren't partisan questions.

---