The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
*** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD ***
|
(01-27-2020, 12:44 PM)mikesez Wrote:(01-27-2020, 12:02 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: Are we talking about what is OK or what is legal? You like to change your intent a lot, huh? Legally, Comey was allowed to open that investigation. He wasn’t, however, allowed to obtain surveillance warrants based on information he knew was incorrect and the myriad of other illegal decisions. It’s OK to not know what you’re talking about. Yes, it requires more to obtain a surveillance warrant than it does to start an investigation. You keep moving the posts and changing your arguments each time your shown how you’re wrong. It’s no wonder people jump on you all the time. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.