(01-27-2020, 03:19 PM)Gabe Wrote:

(01-27-2020, 03:16 PM)jj82284 Wrote: It's the seriousness of the charge!!!  Exculpatory evidence be darned, let's just keep digging for dirt till we drive his numbers down, I mean get to the somber truth.

Is that why the kneejerk response is to call Hunter/Joe Biden and the whistleblower, among others, to testify in exchange for the testimony of Pompeo/Bolton/etc.? I mean, if we're gonna dig, let's all dig.

The statements of the ukrainians exculpate the president of the current charges.  If you charge him with murdering someone whose still demonstrably alive then theres no evidence that can trump the guys pulse.  

Conversely, the charges boil down to corrupt intent of official office to improperly investigate joe biden. A material element of that fact pattern is the incident put forth as the predicate for the investigation (the admitted extortion of the Ukrainians to fire a prosecutor).  The veracity of Probable cause or reasonable suspicion has bearing on the aspect of corrupt intent.  

There is no such potential when the alleged target of the president's actions clearly states he was never extorted.  

Ironic that the people screaming loudest for more witnesses and further investigation are the least familiar with the charges, their elements, and the basic facts of the case.

---

(01-27-2020, 04:49 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:

(01-27-2020, 02:36 PM)mikesez Wrote: You only answered one of my two questions.

Because it was irrelevant to the conversation. Did Trump send government officials to conduct surveillance and spy on his adversaries while simultaneously violating their 4th amendment? Because sending a business associate on a fishing expedition isn’t that.

+1

Everything they are accusing the president of doing, Comey, Brennan and Clapper have been proven to have done.  Nothing illustrates the modern cultural triad of progressive supremacy better than the difference in coverage between these two stories.

---