(01-27-2020, 05:40 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:

(01-27-2020, 05:24 PM)mikesez Wrote: You're technically correct. But even though this is not in the Constitution, it's usually illegal for one person to follow another person everywhere they go.  You know that, right?

---

Ukraine's president will say anything to make his country and his regime seem strong.
And in any case, he can't be brought in to testify under oath.

1. Did you follow Giuliani (?) to know he followed someone (?) everywhere? If not you, who did? Or did Schiff just make that up too?

2. Do you personally know that Zelensky would "say anything to make his country and regime seem strong?" Or maybe Schiff made up that whopper too? In any case, Zelensky loses nothing by claiming that Trump threatened to withhold funds so your statement is ridiculous. He already got the funds, and the Dems in the House would probably send him $10B next year if he took down Trump.

Mike this is a perfect example of why I call you disingenuous. I don't think you're a liar, but I was going to point out the same objections as Malabar. Your bias skews the argument completely outside the realm of the defensible. The bolded parts above are stated like they are facts, when they are not. It's completely presumptuous for you to present them that way. Who can argue against the made-up intent you inject into the discussion? You should retract it, figure out where your'e inserting your bias into the discussion, and stop it.
 
I know for a fact that the Ukraine president considers honesty the preeminent virtue. He would NEVER tell a lie, no matter what. Interesting fact: he also thinks you're a moron.

---