Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
*** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD ***

(This post was last modified: 01-27-2020, 07:13 PM by Gabe.)

(01-27-2020, 05:40 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
(01-27-2020, 05:24 PM)mikesez Wrote: You're technically correct. But even though this is not in the Constitution, it's usually illegal for one person to follow another person everywhere they go.  You know that, right?


Ukraine's president will say anything to make his country and his regime seem strong.
And in any case, he can't be brought in to testify under oath.

1. Did you follow Giuliani (?) to know he followed someone (?) everywhere? If not you, who did? Or did Schiff just make that up too?


2. Do you personally know that Zelensky would "say anything to make his country and regime seem strong?" Or maybe Schiff made up that whopper too? In any case, Zelensky loses nothing by claiming that Trump threatened to withhold funds so your statement is ridiculous. He already got the funds, and the Dems in the House would probably send him $10B next year if he took down Trump.

(01-27-2020, 05:40 PM)Gabe Wrote: MB, I have no doubt your ire for the Kavanaugh hearings, you've clearly & eloquently stated it before. I understand and can appreciate that perspective. I, like Brett, like beer too. 

But the latter part of your statement leads to another question: Do you believe the witnesses democrats want to call would fabricate lies?

Is the Pope Catholic?

OK, maybe not the best response these days. Please substitute the one about the bear.
So it's your opinion that not just Bolton, but Pompeo, Mulvaney, Perry and Trump (to name a few of the sought-after witnesses) would be untruthful under oath? 

No pun intended, but I find that (your opinion) hard to believe.
I'll play you in ping pong. 
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-28-2019, 01:59 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-16-2020, 08:21 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-21-2020, 04:06 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 01-21-2020, 04:18 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-22-2020, 01:29 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by StroudCrowd1 - 01-22-2020, 01:32 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:37 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:43 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 02:18 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by flsprtsgod - 01-23-2020, 03:42 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-24-2020, 12:58 PM
RE: *** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD *** - by Gabe - 01-27-2020, 07:12 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-30-2020, 02:47 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-18-2019, 01:57 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!