Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
*** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD ***

(This post was last modified: 01-29-2020, 06:25 PM by mikesez.)

(01-29-2020, 05:52 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
(01-29-2020, 01:52 PM)mikesez Wrote: The Kavanaugh hearings were a debacle, and it was 100% the Democrats' fault.
They brought in a witness with vague memories of having a bad time with Kavanaugh when they were teenagers.  These allegations were not relevant to the question of if Kavanaugh the adult was the right person to be a judge.
They were allowed to call whatever witness they wanted, and they called an irrelevant witness. 
I don't think the Democrats should be allowed to call any irrelevant witness here, or ever again. 
But is John Bolton an irrelevant witness?
What about Mulvaney?

We don't know whether or not Bolton is an irrelevant witness. Even if not, it's easy to spin something in his testimony to open the path for the new Julie Swetnick.

Sorry Dems, you had your chance. You wasted it with Kavanaugh. No second chances for purveyors of false information. No "I'll only call credible witnesses this time," especially after the numerous lies Schiff has been putting forth.

The Republicans aren't being asked to just "allow witnesses". Chuck Schumer has a specific list of four witnesses, and Mitch McConnell could allow a separate vote on each one. 
In fact I think the judiciary committee worked the same way. The only reason you saw a blasey-ford on the stand was because a couple of Republican senators voted to allow her specifically as a witness, after the Democrats begged and moaned.
Swetnik was not brought to the stand.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-28-2019, 01:59 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-16-2020, 08:21 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-21-2020, 04:06 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 01-21-2020, 04:18 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-22-2020, 01:29 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by StroudCrowd1 - 01-22-2020, 01:32 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:37 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 01:43 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-23-2020, 02:18 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by flsprtsgod - 01-23-2020, 03:42 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-24-2020, 12:58 PM
RE: *** THE OFFICIAL IMPEACHMENT THREAD *** - by mikesez - 01-29-2020, 06:23 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 01-30-2020, 02:47 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-18-2019, 01:57 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!