(10-24-2017, 08:10 AM)JackCity Wrote:

(10-24-2017, 07:02 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: I guess you and I can agree to disagree, because I see a QB who's strength is the "zip" he puts on the passes, especially on 15-20 yard crossing patterns. That, along with his unbelievable accuracy and ability to throw a great deep ball, makes me believe he is ideal. I see him as a much more polished and NFL ready QB than Jackson. I guess it all depends on what you are looking for in a QB though. If you value athleticism, then yes, Jackson is the better prospect, but personally, I could care less about athleticism at the QB position. Tom Brady is a terrible "athlete" when it comes to 40 times and strength and he's still the best QB to walk the planet. I value football I.Q., leadership, accuracy and instincts over anything else. That's what I see in Rudolph. That's just my opinion though. If you think differently, that's your right. To each their own.

Athletiscm doesn't make a great QB. Being a great passer along with being very mobile is a big + in today's NFL. Guys like Dak, Wentz, Alex Smith, Luck, Wilson etc etc all use it to great effect. Jackson's up their with Cam and Vick but is way more refined than both.  

I don't mind Rudolph as a QB at all. Just in the NFL I don't see him as having a high ceiling and being anything more than a low end starter.  Probably my #4 guy in this class.