(11-16-2017, 01:13 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(11-16-2017, 12:24 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: I'm just thinking its more likely neither draft a QB that high....since they traded for the others...

It's not like those teams are going all in on those QB's they added. They only spent 2nd round picks in those trades and Garoppolo isn't even signed long term. This is more like an audition and passing on a potential franchise QB in the draft, when Jimmy G. might not work out could be catastrophic for the Niners. As for Cleveland, why wouldn't they double down? They have a ton of draft picks and if they pass on another franchise QB in the draft, those fans might riot. Personally, I can pretty much assure you as someone who lives in the Cincinnati area, A.J. McCarron is not the answer. He's a solid backup with limited potential.

---

I think Cleveland def goes QB #1...I don't think they go for McCarron for a 2nd round pick.  They are already loaded with guys that are just "meh" at the position...Kizer (2nd rounder) Kessler (3rd rounder)...Rookie QB (1st rounder)...how many guys do you need at QB?

For San Fran I can guarantee Garoppolo gets a long term deal (minus injury)...I think they go Saquon Barkley because Cleveland will go QB #1....

Cleveland can't risk  Rosen/Rudolph/Jackson going picks #2 - #8...NYG/Cin/Den/LAC could all easily go QB and then TB sitting at #8 is a prime trade partner for someone wanting to jump Cleveland if they don't go QB #1.

---