(10-14-2017, 04:32 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(10-14-2017, 03:46 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: If the Walmart employee stands outside their store, in Walmart attire, while protesting then they're going to get fired. They don't have to clock in and be stocking the shelves.

Customers still come inside but it's still disruptive.

Okay, so what's your [BLEEP] point? The NFL has 32 owners. If they don't like it they can fire anybody they want and let the Union deal with it. So sick of this double standard bull [BLEEP] argument with people. "Oh I can't do it so why can they?". Same reason why people like Trump can get into office after being publicly embarrassed when bragging about grabbing women by the [BLEEP] or why the scumbag Clinton family can get away with a high body count and political corruption that makes the Bush family blush in envy. It's called double standards. And virtually every side of the political realm and debate on this [BLEEP] is guilty of it. Period.

---

You said it wasn't "on the job" It's clearly "on the job". Many people have been fired for something similar. You wanted to say that wearing your TEAM uniform, at the TEAM'S stadium, while on television with your TEAM'S name isn't "on the job". My only point was to show that you're wrong. If you want to respond like a child about something that doesn't apply to me, that's your problem. This clearly bothers you more than it does me.

I never said they shouldn't be allowed to do it. You're just too hot-headed to realize it. I personally don't care enough about this to protest it. I think what they're doing is stupid because it's based on a lie; that's why I don't support what they're doing. I don't think they should be fired.

---