Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Poll: I would rather have...
This poll is closed.
A team with players who kneel
73.91%
17 73.91%
No team at all if the players kneel
26.09%
6 26.09%
Total 23 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Team that kneels or no team at all?

#36

(10-18-2017, 09:40 AM)raptor6581 Wrote:
(10-18-2017, 09:32 AM)MalabarJag Wrote:
1. True, the business allowed it, but you were talking about "rights." This was never about whether or not the government would prohibit it, so "rights" don't come into the picture. If you want to rephrase the question ...


2. Kneeling during the US anthem and standing during the British anthem implies that the team feels otherwise.

3. How is playing the anthem political? Is there a political party that opposes the anthem?

4. I agree. I also suspect that Kaep originally just sat because he was pissed at the team for not starting and then claimed a just cause when he was called out for it. But it's offensive no matter what the cause. Wouldn't you agree that waving the Nazi flag at an event would be offensive no matter what the cause? You can argue that one is insulting and another isn't, but about half the population finds both to be offensive, and insulting to the country they love.

To answer you question again, it's not about properly using your rights. It's about the method of protesting.
1) it IS about rights. They are utilizing their right to protest, within the confines of the law and the confines of what their employer deems acceptable. No need to rephrase, as all pertinent parties to the action are in agreement on the protest.

2)Kneeling during our national anthem shows the players taking issue with a perceived (true or not) problem within our nation. They arent protesting to the British, to the British government, or anything about the UK's problem. Their actions during the UK' s anthem are honestly irrelevant to anything here, as the song does not apply to the US in any way.

3)Yes, the anthem is being used politically when it comes to sports. The NFL was paid to start playing it, in an effort to increase military support and service. Thats a political move....

4) you have again claimed the action is offensive, but have not explained why. What is offensive about taking a knee? Its what you do to show respect when asking a woman to marry you, praying, for an injured player, and in several other ways. So, why is it suddenly offensive when kneeling during the anthem?

And lastly, that doesnt answer the question. It doesn't answer it because you have yet to answer how protesting during the anthem is offensive, just that you find it offenaive. This should be easy.... If you find something offensive, you should be able to clearly articulate what you find offensive about it, and why.

Sent from my LG-TP260 using Tapatalk

1. It's not about "rights." They could protest anywhere in any manner they chose. They elected to piss on the US during an entertainment venue. The timing of the protest as well as the actual (rather than the claimed) target of the protest is the problem. They are not protesting in front of a police station, which would be the right place to do so for the (false) cause they expound.

2. Doing it at that particular time and place puts Britain ahead of the US. It's not just my opinion, Jags management admitted as much in the apology.

3. Nice deflection, but still a fail. Increasing military support and service is political? What political party opposes that?

4. I find it offensive to distract from the national anthem and blame the US for a political-based lie. Apparently you don't, but I'm not alone in my opinion. How many times do I need to explain this?



                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Team that kneels or no team at all? - by FBT - 10-16-2017, 02:20 PM
RE: Team that kneels or no team at all? - by Kane - 10-16-2017, 02:42 PM
RE: Team that kneels or no team at all? - by MalabarJag - 10-18-2017, 11:13 AM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!