Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Russian collusion - a smoking gun


(12-13-2017, 11:20 PM)rollerjag Wrote:
(12-10-2017, 06:59 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: We know what they have based on the charges they've taken from the two people they've arrested.

Fraud and obstruction.

They're taking charges for lying about doing something that was legal. If that wasn't such a high-profile case, it wouldn't even have gone to court. That is a dumb case. I've participated in 1,000's of arrest and never has one been about lying about doing something legal. 

This isn't an attempt to discredit Mueller. He's doing it to himself. He appointed a staff full of people that are anti-Trump. That one agent's behavior regarding the dossier and interviewing Hillary is outrageous. He shouldn't ever have been considered for a role in the investigation. There's legitimate concerns over the motive behind their investigation, and that only happened because one of two possible reasons.

1.) The investigators with anti-Trump beliefs or pro-Democrat beliefs didn't disclose them. The only reason they wouldn't is because they had ulterior motives. 

or...

2.) The investigators did disclose them, and Mueller didn't care about them. Then he has ulterior motives.  

8 of the lawyers on his team are Democrat donors, and 5 of them gave to Hillary's campaign. And some of the others have connections to the Clinton foundation. If you don't see a problem with this then you aren't willing.

Why would someone lie about doing something legal? Does that question not even come to your mind?

Failing to accurately recall a series of legal events is a crime, but it's not the same as lying. Just ask Martha Stewart. Those kind of charges are what come out of a high profile and expensive investigation that can't put together any real evidence to charge the main target. It's face saving for the persecutors.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by MalabarJag - 10-18-2017, 09:57 PM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by nate - 10-30-2017, 11:31 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 12-01-2017, 01:15 PM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by Kane - 12-01-2017, 01:18 PM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by Kane - 12-01-2017, 01:43 PM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by Kane - 12-01-2017, 01:27 PM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by flsprtsgod - 12-14-2017, 08:27 AM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by Kane - 12-11-2017, 03:20 PM
RE: Russian collusion - a smoking gun - by Kane - 12-11-2017, 04:45 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!