Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Browns 5 minutes late to land AJ MCCaron

#1

In typical Browns fashion they respond to the NFL office at 4pm instead of 355pm. The Browns offered a 2nd and a 3rd to the Bengals. 

But now it's terminated so they are stuck with Kizer.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Why would the Bungles want to trade their only good backup QB to a division rival anyway? That trade would have backfired on them.
Reply

#3

I think their incompetence saved them here. I don’t think McCarron is going to be anybody’s savior and isn’t worth what was reportedly agreed to, especially considering where the browns will be drafting in each round.
Reply

#4
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2017, 07:22 PM by JaguarsWoman.)

(10-31-2017, 07:09 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: I think their incompetence saved them here. I don’t think McCarron is going to be anybody’s savior and isn’t worth what was reportedly agreed to, especially considering where the browns will be drafting in each round.

Cincinnati was unwilling to trade him in the offseason for the same reason New England refused to trade Jimmy Garoppolo at any price. Several NFL.com analysts wrote inexperience, not talent, would make trading A.J. McCarron (who only started five games in his career) a big mistake by the Browns, citing the Brock Osweiler disaster in Houston. I agree with that sentiment, but McCarron could be an upgrade because it is the Browns.
Reply

#5

Hahahahahaha is this legit?
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


Reply

#7

Gotta say though, this should tell you all you need to know about McCarron. Cincy wouldn't be trading a potential franchise QB to a division rival.
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#8
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2017, 08:19 PM by JaguarsWoman.)

(10-31-2017, 08:12 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Gotta say though, this should tell you all you need to know about McCarron. Cincy wouldn't be trading a potential franchise QB to a division rival.

Nothing tells you everything we need to know about A.J. McCarron. He was never going to be a franchise QB because the Bungles already had one.
Reply

#9

(10-31-2017, 08:18 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-31-2017, 08:12 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Gotta say though, this should tell you all you need to know about McCarron. Cincy wouldn't be trading a potential franchise QB to a division rival.

Nothing tells you everything we need to know about A.J. McCarron. He was never going to be a franchise QB because the Bungles already had one.

So bc he was on the bench of a team with a guy in place, there's zero chance he could have the talent to be a franchise QB?
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Wow.  Just when I thought that the Browns' front office couldn't screw up any worse...


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#11

(10-31-2017, 08:12 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Gotta say though, this should tell you all you need to know about McCarron. Cincy wouldn't be trading a potential franchise QB to a division rival.

Exactly.  Willing to let a player go to a division rival, especially at the QB position doesn't exactly put a lot of stock in said player.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#12
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2017, 08:42 PM by JaguarsWoman.)

(10-31-2017, 08:33 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: Wow.  Just when I thought that the Browns' front office couldn't screw up any worse...

LOL It does not surprise me because they are the Browns. This is the same team that passed on a legit franchise QB most people knew was going to be the #2 overall pick.
Reply

#13

(10-31-2017, 08:18 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-31-2017, 08:12 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Gotta say though, this should tell you all you need to know about McCarron. Cincy wouldn't be trading a potential franchise QB to a division rival.

Nothing tells you everything we need to know about A.J. McCarron. He was never going to be a franchise QB because the Bungles already had one.

Actually it somewhat does.  This is similar to the New England trade of Ryan Mallot a few years back.  Everyone thought that he had the potential to be a franchise QB and would be the "heir apparent" to Tom Brady, yet he was traded away and he's still a backup today.  McCarron might have the potential to be a franchise QB, yet the Bengals were willing to trade him to a division rival.  The Bengals also wanted to unload him now and potentially get something of value since he becomes a free agent (restricted) after this season.  They could have gotten two draft picks in the deal (a 2nd and a 3rd).

The point is, a POTENTIAL franchise QB is ideally what every team wants behind their current franchise QB.  The trade attempt means that another team will probably acquire him (if they want) for money instead of draft picks once he hits free agency.  IF another team signs him to an offer sheet, the Bengals have the opportunity to either match the offer or let him walk.  If they don't match his offer then all they get is a 5th round pick (the round that he was drafted in).  If they do match the offer, they are forced to pay him more money.  The Bengals don't want to pay him.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

91% sure that’s an untrue report.

Browns signed the trade and sent a copy to Bengals to sign and send to NFL. Bengals sent the copy signed only by the Browns.
Reply

#15

(10-31-2017, 09:12 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote: 91% sure that’s an untrue report.

Browns signed the trade and sent a copy to Bengals to sign and send to NFL. Bengals sent the copy signed only by the Browns.


Quote:Per (Tom) Pelissero, the Bengals turned in paperwork by the NFL's trade deadline Tuesday, but the Browns did not.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...rron-trade
Reply

#16

(10-31-2017, 09:12 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote: 91% sure that’s an untrue report.

Browns signed the trade and sent a copy to Bengals to sign and send to NFL. Bengals sent the copy signed only by the Browns.

A CORNucopia of crap?
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

#17

McCarron isn't worth that much at all! If the story is true, I think it was the hand of God that stepped in and saved the Browns from making a truly stupid move. That franchise is completely inept.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

(10-31-2017, 10:31 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: McCarron isn't worth that much at all! If the story is true, I think it was the hand of God that stepped in and saved the Browns from making a truly stupid move. That franchise is completely inept.

Cleveland's inexcusable failure to fax the papers in by 4:00 despite having a deal in hand at 3:55 (when Cincinnati submitted its papers to the league office) was the stupid move, not trying to trade for a QB Hue Jackson knows very well and has worked with before.
Reply

#19

(10-31-2017, 08:18 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote:
(10-31-2017, 08:12 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: Gotta say though, this should tell you all you need to know about McCarron. Cincy wouldn't be trading a potential franchise QB to a division rival.

Nothing tells you everything we need to know about A.J. McCarron. He was never going to be a franchise QB because the Bungles already had one.

Yeah, like that loser that sat on the bench behind Favre.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#20

This with the story that the Browns coaching is super pissed that FO left early Monday and missed out on the Garappolo trade. Getting the feeling the people in charge in Cleveland dont know what the hell there doing.

 
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!