The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Fournette needs just 77 yards to have 1k
|
(12-13-2017, 06:18 AM)JagFanatic24 Wrote: Fournette would be picked over Adams for me. He has completely changed our entire offense. He won the Pittsburgh game. He won the Seahawks game with close out runs. Adams is going to be good but Fournette will be the best RB in the NFL probably by his 3rd season. Before the 90 yd td run, which was when the game was already decided and we were just running the clock out, he had 27 rushes for 91 yards and a TD. He did not win the game for us, the defense did. I do not believe that is really disputable. Like I said, I love me some Fournette, and I'm completely happy with him. I just think that in the long run we could have gotten more value out of the pick. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.