(12-13-2017, 09:20 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: we have the best defense in the NFL... in what world would picking adams have solidified our future better?  The impact adams would have had, even IF he was better than our current starter(which is no guarantee) would have netted us the same ranked defense we have now

fournette has changed this offenses identity.. in a MASSIVE way

You are crazy if you think our O-line's improvement isnt partially because they have had fournette back there and it inspires them and gives them belief in the offense

You're quick to point out FBT calling you names but then you go and call me crazy because I have a different idea of what would be better for this team than you? Adams is going to be special for the next ten years. Church is league average and not getting any younger. I just think in the long run Adams would have been more valuable. You know, you can disagree with someone without calling them crazy. It's not that hard. And i do not think the O-lines 8mprovement has anything to do with fournette. This is their job, what they do for a living. They aren't going to half [BLEEP] it because one of their runnjing backs isn't as good as the other. Yeldon and ivory both had success when fournette was out.

---

Kamara and hunt both could have been had with out third round pick. Both are playing just as well.

---