The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Gus Bradley's concern with lack of takeaways.
|
Gus, Gus, Gus.... smh. Schematically you would like to run Cover 3 most of the time and blitz very little. You have said it yourself, you would prefer not to blitz and to get pressure with your front 4 only. The problem with this is that we are not getting the consistent pressure with our front 4 only. How is this going to effect the QB and force errant throws?
How in the world are you supposed to get a ton of turnovers when you preach a defense that allows the opposing team to throw everything underneath and to tackle the WR for a short gain? This is going on 4 years of our team "lacking interceptions". Common denominator is...................... We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.