Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mass Shooting at Parkland, FL High School

#74
(This post was last modified: 02-15-2018, 03:56 PM by DarloJAG84.)

(02-15-2018, 03:52 PM)Caldrac Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:40 PM)DarloJAG84 Wrote: Ok so here are a few perfectly legitimate questions, through genuinely not knowing the answers:

Why is it a "right" to have a firearm? I mean, sure they provide a form of defence, but would that be completely necessary if the laws didn't allow them altogether?

I (partly) understand that there's a  sport element to it, but can't these "sports" weapons be locked up at sporting facilities and be accessed when the "sport" commences?

Personally, I don't see how shooting is a sport, but that's a different matter and one I'm not going to entertain an argument for.

I just really struggle with why people have a legitimate "right" to hold deadly weapons. My intention is not to offend anyone, and I understand that a lot of things can be used as a deadly weapon.. knives, hammers etc.. but they have a primary purpose.. I've never seen anyone try to cut a steak or put up a picture frame using a Glock G19 or a Mossberg 500..

It was primarily put into place by our founding fathers. And it was mostly put into place to help protect the people from absolute tyranny in the event the Government decides to go haywire. Which is funny thinking about it today because the Government and the real owners of our Government and society already worked around that dilemma by simply giving us the illusion of freedom and democracy when it's really not. All of it went out the window with this simple little work around:

https://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm

I see.. It's a bizarre one, I'm all for people having human rights etc, but I'm not sure I can get on board with possessing a gun as a right, personally. Gladly, for me, it's not a headache I have to live with.

(02-15-2018, 03:54 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:46 PM)DarloJAG84 Wrote: Which revolution are we talking about? I know next to nothing about American history..

I dunno what the British call it. The Loss of Colonies? The Colonial Dust Up? The Colonials Uprising?

I've literally no idea.. I was just trying to gauge peoples opinions on here really.. I could form a pros and cons list for possessing guns and the pros list would be completely blank from my view.
[Image: 5S5POfa.jpg]

80% of what I talk about is nonesense.. the other 25% is made up statistics...


 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Mass Shooting at Parkland, FL High School - by DarloJAG84 - 02-15-2018, 03:55 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!