(02-21-2018, 08:07 PM)knarnn Wrote:

(02-21-2018, 07:29 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: I don't like either one. Neither could even get to the minimum cutoff rate of 60% passes completed. That is very telling for me.

Did you see the part about his 12% drop rate? Highest out of all the top rated QBs.

I don't care. Drops are a part of the game. Even with the drops, these QB's should at least hit 60%.

---

(02-21-2018, 08:16 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: The issue here is that every QB has flaws but yet Jackson is being told he should move to WR. Just because he’s fast?

If the right team gets a hold of him, watch out. If it’s the Jags, how in the world could you stop Jackson and Fournette? We run the option a lot out of shotgun and Jackson would be elite the second he steps in the field.

He’s got things he needs to work on but they all do. Jackson should be in the conversation with all the top QBs.

No, it has nothing to do with him being fast. He struggles with his passes from the pocket and more importantly he is rail thin. If you saw him in his uniform and never saw him play, you'd swear he was a WR or a tall DB. Guys with physiques like this just don't hold up as QB's in the NFL, especially when a big part of their success depends upon them running the ball.

---