(03-30-2018, 05:27 PM)pirkster Wrote:

(03-30-2018, 05:20 PM)rollerjag Wrote: Fair enough, he just attempted to discredit my assessment of Trump by invoking the Clinton Clause. Trump may be bad, but those Clintons...

I was calling you out for faking to have standards, and claiming a high ground where there was none.

So, now you're upset that someone who is objective enough to acknowledge Trump's achievements (i.e. be intellectually honest - which you name call as "Trumpette"-ism) is actually illustrating relevancy to character, where you claimed character was irrelevant to such a person.

Is hypocrisy that reflexive to those infected by the cult of the left?

Could you possibly be more obtuse? Is stereotyping any critic of Trump as a member of the cult of the left that reflexive to those infected by the cult of the right? You're fooling yourself if you think you're above the fray.

None of this upsets me, none of it has any direct affect on my life. I'm just a cynical observer of this ludicrous sideshow you and others put in the White House, with too much free time.

My opinion is Donald Trump is a piece of [BLEEP], an opinion formed over decades of paying attention to what he does and what he says. If he achieves good for the country, it will be despite his character flaws, and he will still be a piece of [BLEEP].

Again, the Clintons are bad. Trump is bad. The two are not mutually exclusive.

---