The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Dareus at it again...
|
(07-13-2018, 03:06 PM)pirkster Wrote:(07-13-2018, 11:48 AM)brianmsbc Wrote: They weren't oblivious. They actually brought up that very point. They said that the Commish reserves the right to suspend someone based on his belief of whether they are guilty, regardless of any charges or lack of charges. And then we have a thousand more of these next year as the leeches learn that there's consequences for their marks with a much lower burden of proof. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
|
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.