Last I heard the committee recommendation vote has been postponed. The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to hold full hearings on this accusation at the beginning of Next Week.

Just to Recap, The accuser in this case does not know when this alleged incident happened. This accuser does not know where this alleged incident happened. The accuser has named one potential corroborating witness, Mark Judge, who categorically denies that the event ever took place. The Accuser points to one other documented recounting of her story to a Couples therapist in 2012, some 30 years after the alleged incident and the released notes from that session do NOT name Bret Kavanaugh, just a random group of 4 (not two as the accuser currently asserts) Boys who attacked her at some alleged party/get together.

What the @#$^ Is there to investigate?

With sexual assault charges we have actually begun to invert the concept of due process. The modern left (in the public eye anyway) has lead us down the perception that an alleged victim has the right to be believed. What that means is that any woman making an allegation of sexual assault against a man is to be believed regardless of the veracity of her claim and apart from any supporting evidence or the lack there of. In reality, in a free democratic society with the presumption of innocence, then the opposite should be true. Criminal investigations should only be launched when there is probable cause that a crime has been committed and there is some supporting evidence. In the case of modern sexual assault the fact that the accuser is female is all the probable cause that the media needs. This claim is lacking any supporting evidence or even a basic testable premise of time place setting etc. The idea that we are going to give this woman the floor of the United States Senate to tell some sad story about a Party she doesn't even remember is laughable on its face.

Anyone comparing this to Merrick Garland is either ignorant or kidding themselves. The Republicans controlled the Senate and stated very clearly that they were not going to consider Garland's nomination because of previous stances taken by the Democrats and the coming election. They didn't coordinate a leak strategy to time a Story and destroy the name he spent his entire life building on the foundation of baseless unprovable claims to make him out to be a rapist. #contextmatters.

---