Just read her opening statement and it is somewhat convincing for having no evidence to back it up, but writing a convincing story doesn’t require it to be true. Just watch any well written TV show or movie. It also doesn’t even require it to have been prepared by her.

What’s interesting to me is she felt the need to state that this isn’t politically motivated and that she’s “fiercely independent”. Unfortunately that doesn’t pass the smell test considering who she initially contacted with the allegation, who she’s hired as her lawyer and the fact that she’s allowed the release of her story to be timed exactly how the democrats want it to be timed, which is, not only to stop his nomination but to also hopefully put the democrats in better position for the potential next nominee if they are successful in destroying Kavanaugh’s character since that would not occur until after the midterms. If your only motivation is to stop Kavanaugh, wouldn’t you just bypass the political operatives and find one or more news outlets willing to run your story as soon as possible once he was announced as the nominee?

The statement of no political motivation looks and feels like a lie to me and if you’re lying about that, what are we to do with the rest of your uncorroborated story?

---