(10-04-2018, 04:11 PM)rollerjag Wrote:

(09-17-2018, 02:50 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Because the only witness she named denied it happened? Because it was 36 years ago? Because the timing and handling of this event reeks of the Democrat playbook? Because we already saw it happen to Justice Thomas? Lots of reasons it seems.

---

Lol, the Garland nomination was exactly the correct thing to do. The Congress would and should not have approved a Lame Duck nomination.

Lol, you don't even know what the term "lame duck" means. The lame duck period is between the election and the new president's inauguration. Merrick Garland was nominated months before the 2016 election, not unlike 17 other SCOTUS  nominations made in election years. His was no more a lame duck nomination  than Reagan's nomination of Justice Kennedy who, by the way, was confirmed unanimously by a Democratic congress. Trumpettes like to call (Electoral College) Scoreboard when defending Trump's actions yet will deny the will of the people who elected Obama to a second term, and while they support the U.S. Constitution when it comes to keeping their beloved firearms, they seem to be blind when Republicans were derelict in their Constitutional duty to provide advice and consent on any presidential nomination to the Supreme Court.