Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Rams = 16-0?

#13

(10-31-2018, 01:51 PM)Caldrac Wrote: They'll lose a game or two. It'll happen. Honestly they were lucky against the Packers. Had Montgomery not [BLEEP] up that kick return there's a good chance Rodgers marches downfield for the win. They've also won some tight games. It's not like they're burying opponents. They've also had the easiest schedule so far this year after adjustments SOS wise.

They barely beat the Seahawks 33 to 31 back on the 7th and they barely beat the Broncos 23 to 20 on the 14th. Good chance they lose these next two games to the Saints and Seahawks. And if they don't lose there you've got a primo match up with KC coming up on the 19th of next month. The Bears and Eagles will also give them a tough time defensively.

I think they'll finish either 13 - 3 or 12 - 4 this year.

Montgomery was an idiot. I watched that play as it happened. I’m surprised they didn’t leave him on the tarmac at LAX
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Rams = 16-0? - by SamusAranX - 10-31-2018, 07:56 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by jagherd - 10-31-2018, 08:24 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by nhiverson - 10-31-2018, 10:02 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by jagherd - 10-31-2018, 10:16 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by jagherd - 10-31-2018, 10:25 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by imtheblkranger - 10-31-2018, 10:36 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by NYC4jags - 10-31-2018, 11:52 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by flgatorsandjags - 10-31-2018, 01:06 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by TrivialPursuit - 10-31-2018, 01:30 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Caldrac - 10-31-2018, 01:51 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by SamusAranX - 10-31-2018, 05:22 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Mikey - 10-31-2018, 02:18 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by TheO-LineMatters - 10-31-2018, 04:32 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Mikey - 11-01-2018, 09:49 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by snowwolf776 - 10-31-2018, 10:24 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Captain_Caldwell - 11-01-2018, 02:28 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by MoJagFan - 11-01-2018, 10:13 AM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by flgatorsandjags - 11-04-2018, 08:28 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Tyler1Reformed - 11-04-2018, 08:54 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by snowwolf776 - 11-04-2018, 08:56 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by NH3 - 11-04-2018, 09:03 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by snowwolf776 - 11-04-2018, 09:06 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Byron LeftTown - 11-04-2018, 09:10 PM
RE: Rams = 16-0? - by Jags239 - 11-04-2018, 09:49 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!