Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Sam Bradford for and against

#43

(11-04-2018, 05:20 PM)empty Wrote:
(11-04-2018, 02:01 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Yeah. I think any vet of more than 4 years in the league is exempt from the waiver process.

No, he's subject to waivers.  I believe after the trade deadline all released players are subject to waivers, though I can't recall which article/tweet I saw that on.  The ESPN column and Shefter tweets both say he's on waivers Monday.

Interesting.  Quote I found that lays it out:


Quote:When an NFL team releases a player who has less than four years of NFL service, he is subject to the waiver wire process. NFL players who are released and have four or more years of accrued time in the league become immediate free agents. Accrued seasons are earned by being on the active 53-man roster for a team for six games in a single regular season, or being on an injury list for six games in a regular season.

During the NFL season, starting from the NFL trading deadline through the end of the regular season, vested veterans (those with 4+ years of experience) are also subject to the waiver process. That means any veterans cut after Week 8 will go through waivers along with non-vested veterans. But [until week 8] , only players with three or less years of experience go through waivers.

SB Nation cincy jungle site ^
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Kane - 11-05-2018, 04:56 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Trunt8728 - 11-05-2018, 05:11 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by MikePete54 - 11-05-2018, 05:16 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by TJBender - 11-05-2018, 10:38 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Mikey - 11-06-2018, 09:42 AM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Setsuna00 - 11-07-2018, 02:36 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Trunt8728 - 11-08-2018, 08:04 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by NYC4jags - 11-08-2018, 09:36 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by RicoTx - 11-09-2018, 08:26 AM
Sam Bradford for and against - by Andy G - 11-03-2018, 05:19 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Jagwired - 11-03-2018, 05:23 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by SuperJville - 11-03-2018, 05:27 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by rfc17 - 11-03-2018, 05:33 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Dewboy01 - 11-03-2018, 06:31 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by flsprtsgod - 11-03-2018, 05:46 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by JackCity - 11-03-2018, 06:17 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by nhiverson - 11-03-2018, 08:18 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by TJBender - 11-03-2018, 10:07 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by SeldomRite - 11-04-2018, 01:53 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by NYC4jags - 11-04-2018, 02:01 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by empty - 11-04-2018, 05:20 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by NYC4jags - 11-04-2018, 05:33 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by snowwolf776 - 11-04-2018, 05:45 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by TJBender - 11-05-2018, 10:06 AM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Trunt8728 - 11-03-2018, 10:42 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Rockman1966 - 11-03-2018, 10:45 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Russian - 11-03-2018, 10:58 PM
Sam Bradford for and against - by Jords808 - 11-04-2018, 01:06 AM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Setsuna00 - 11-04-2018, 03:27 AM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by waveZ666 - 11-04-2018, 06:27 AM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by Mowerguy - 11-04-2018, 08:57 AM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by TheBigDawg - 11-04-2018, 02:50 PM
RE: Sam Bradford for and against - by AZ fan - 11-04-2018, 06:59 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!