(11-08-2018, 06:00 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(11-07-2018, 05:41 PM)Dockerill91 Wrote: As I said initially I'd be up for a QB prospect early. But if we don't go that route I'd prefer a WR over OL or TE.

Our offensive line woes can be attributed to injuries and just quite frankly telegraphing every play we're about to run (new OC please) and TE I think given WR this can help out with TE. We've had far to many drops from our WR core this year and Harry just doesnt drop balls.

Not me. If we don't go QB, I'd definitely take an O-Lineman and then probably a TE. A good QB can make average WR's better.

Yeah.  I think a WR group of Lee, Westbrook, Chark, Cole isn't really as bad as everyone wants to make it out to be right now  -- especially when you put a more accurate QB under center.  Lots of exaggeration floating about concerning these receivers currently. It's not as bad as folks want to portray it, IMO. 

I'm all for adding another receiver - I just can't imagine putting that ahead of QB, OL or TE given the state of this offensive roster.  Of course - I thought they'd prioritize OL and TE last year too :/

That said - the draft is a LONG way off, and there are certainly scenarios involving free agency and trade that may re-align draft priorities - moving receiver closer to the early rounds.

---