(11-09-2018, 02:34 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(11-09-2018, 02:27 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: Dude. No one liked Hillary and it had nothing to do with Obama.

Hillary's entire agenda would have been an extension of Obama. She was a rotten soul with a rotten agenda. Double negative.

---

(11-09-2018, 01:41 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: I think Bernie would have stomped Trump in 2016, but I don't think he can do it now. He was their best chance and they instead picked the worst possible candidate.

They don't really have that star power now. Everyone on the left loves Michelle, so I guess it's as good as any. Not sure she'd want to do it though.

People like Michelle and Oprah are much more comfortable taking drive by shots at Trump. I'd be surprised if Michelle is ready to step into the Thunderdome after her husband just humiliated himself on the midterm campaign trail endorsing a bunch of people who lost.

Quote:...Trump endorsed 75 candidates, of whom 21 or 28 percent won. This was the lowest win rate of the other national figures—nearly 50 percent of Vice President Pence’s endorsements won, and over 50 percent of Obama’s and Biden’s endorsees won. Sanders does the best, as his endorsees won 66 percent of the time.

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley