(12-23-2018, 07:39 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(12-23-2018, 07:24 PM)JackCity Wrote: Now apply all of this logic to the Giants.

What? That they would want to trade up as well? I thought of that. They have a lot more needs than we do, particularly on defense. Maybe they don't wanna give up so many draft picks. Other than QB, We really only need O-Line help and a TE or WR. We have the ability to trade away a lot more in picks. The Giants don't have a 3rd round pick and we have two of them. We can fill our needs in this draft and become a contender in 2019 with the right QB, even if we trade our first rounder this coming year, 2020 and in 2021. The Giants are probably a couple of years away from contending, because even if the do get a QB, their defense needs a lot of upgrades. Our defense is solid. We only need to upgrade the passing attack. I can't go another season with question marks at the QB position. Right now, I have Haskins as the only guy in the draft (if he enters), with franchise potential. It's time to commit and commit hard.

---

(12-23-2018, 07:22 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Good God

Are you satisfied with what we've had at QB for years? Sometimes you have to give up a lot to get "your guy." Do you think the Chiefs regret trading up? What about the Rams trading up for Goff or the Bears trading up for Trubisky? Those all look like great moves IMO. Why is it wrong for us to do the same?