(01-16-2019, 06:06 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:

(01-16-2019, 04:11 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: Giants and Bucs are both in good position to draft Haskins (presently), who will be cheaper, has more longevity, and possibly higher upside.

All of the Haskins talk has me laughing.  How exactly does he possibly have higher upside?  Because he is considered the "best" prospect in a weak draft class?  If a turd doesn't stink as much as other turds does that make it the best one?

As good as some people believe Foles to be, no one expecting him to will a team to the playoff/Super Bowl for the rest of career. No is even suggesting that he get paid what Cousins got last year. The Eagles have good surrounding cast around him. Certainly not perfect, but definitely above average.

Sure Haskin's has a lot of question marks, but there are scouts/analysts suggesting he could become the next Big Ben. I never said he definitely has that upside. I just said possibly, because some are throwing it out there. Certainly, it all may be hype. But hype is precisely why even flawed QB's are regularly drafted in the 1st round. All it takes is 1 GM to think that way.

---