If anything, my entire post was how Foles may be cheaper than we think because lack of bidders, which allows the Jags to get him at a cap number that can work. I was argued to target Foles

Why is that one sentence that I even used the word POSSIBLY make everyone freak out. I didn't say Haskins is or will definitely be better than Foles. I didn't even say that Haskins is who the Jags should target. All I was saying is that many times GM's overvalue the potential of the hyped QB in the draft because they are new and they have potential to be "anything" or whatever. Especially, when those GM's and coaches have seen tons of tape of Foles in the NFL and some have even coached against him. Maybe they feel they have a book on Foles or know what his limits are, but don't know the limits of Haskins because they think they can maximize his talents.

No one can deny that Haskins has some potential and that some team will think he is a better long term bet than Foles. How many people on this board predicted what Brady, Brees, Big Ben, or Rodgers would become before they were drafted? Of course, the odds of Haskins getting to such a level is small. But how many QB's have won or even gotten to Super Bowls as starters for different franchises, no matter how good the QB was?

---