(01-28-2019, 05:20 PM)Jags02 Wrote:

(01-26-2019, 01:42 PM)Bullseye Wrote: To me, it depends on what we do pre-draft.

If we get a "strong" vet QB (i.e. Foles), then I'm willing to draft a position other than QB at 7.

If we get a clear bridge QB (i.e. Fitz), I want a QB in round 1.

I'll second this as Foles and Fitz are really the only QBs besides Bortles I'd consider. I'm still considering Bortles for the money, but it sounds like Fitz wouldn't be all that much more on a one-year deal. Should we go with Bortles or sign Fitz, I feel we'd have to use the #7 either to pick a guy or possibly combined with our 2nd and 3rd to move up to #3 for Haskins should he fall that far.

If, however, we actually pay up for a QB and target the only one out there who appears to be worth it... that being Foles... then I'd opt for going a different position in round one (RT or WR) unless Haskins actually does fall that far (highly doubtful)... and then use that third to trade up into the end of round one to take a guy with that fifth-year option. Now we wouldn't get our pick of the litter, but one or two of those first round guys should still be there. ...I'm talking about Grier, Lock, D. Jones or Murray.

This also plays into the free agent market. If we go Fitz while drafting Haskins, for example, then we can go get a RT and/or WR in free agency. On the other hand, if pay up for Foles and draft Grier, for example, then we're looking at getting our RT and WR with our #7 and our remaining 3rd round pick as we wouldn't have any money for prime free agents.