(03-04-2019, 01:42 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote:

(03-04-2019, 01:38 PM)Rico Wrote: Refer to the post above.  If he was one of the best in the NFL, they would have found a way to keep him.  

Of course...he really isn't one of the best in the NFL.  So, there's that.

We get it that you don't like him...but who would you like to trot out there if Haskins/Murray go before Jacksonvill can get either?

You move up and get them.  You can't move up and get them if you've already blown a lot on Foles.  You can't go for a short-term fix on an average quarterback.

As I said, all I can do is root for the team.  But I don't expect this to end well.  I guess we'll all find out.

I don't like the move.  And I seriously can't see how anyone thinks he is one of the best in the NFL.

---

(03-04-2019, 01:55 PM)Ace Nova Wrote:

(03-04-2019, 08:17 AM)Rico Wrote: You're seriously delusional if you think that a team that had 'one of the best in today's NFL' wouldn't find a way to hold onto him.

You're seriously delusional anyway if you think that he is 'one of the best in today's NFL'.

Carson Wentz has been penciled in as the franchise QB since he's been drafted.  If the Eagles did not have Wentz, I assure you we wouldn't be having this conversation right now...Foles would be the starter in Philadelphia.  There's no way the Eagles can keep them both.  Plus, Foles has stated he wants to start and he would not have been the starter going into the 2019 season....so hence, he's a free agent.  It's really not that complicated.  

You're right.  It's not that complicated.  If you think he's one of the best in the NFL, you're going to keep him.  Just because you have someone 'penciled in as the franchise QB' you don't get rid of someone who is one of the best in the NFL.  If you do, you're not going to be around for long.

---