(01-17-2019, 12:15 PM)Jags02 Wrote:

(01-17-2019, 09:38 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Haskins is not the answer. I don’t believe you mortgage your future on this guy. Now if he happens to fall to you and you have him as BAP, take a swing. But, my opinion, he is too flawed and a relatively unknown based on number of games played. Too risky.

Foles is intriguing but once again, is he worth mortgaging the future on? He will come with an astronomical salary that will keep from improving other areas on your football team. We aren’t in a position on offense to do that yet. Also, based on his mediocre past play, I’m inclined to believe it is Phili scheme and surrounding players giving him a boost moreso than his talent. A mojority of his career included numbers far worse than Bortles.

My thought is that you find a competitive FA that fits what you are looking to do offensively with the players you have. You can’t afford the money and time to build around a stop gap QB. This may not be the popular answer but it makes the most sense from a money and personnel stand point. In this draft you can prep your roster for future long term success and actually have QB options the next two drafts instead of chasing a “meh” QB in Haskins.

Explain for us how Haskins is "too flawed."