(01-18-2019, 12:57 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(01-18-2019, 12:54 PM)Jags Wrote: A question for everyone..If you were TC/DC, would you still choose the option you picked?  I see a lot of posts backing their stance with reasons that can be attributed to ‘what’s best for the team” whether long or short term.  With Shad Khan’s statement following the Houston game..

‘’I have the same trust in Tom, Dave and Doug as I did upon their introduction two years ago, and I do believe our best path forward for the moment is the one less disruptive and dramatic.  Stability should not be confused with satisfaction, however.  I am far from content with the status quo and while it’s best to put 2018 behind us, I will not overlook how poorly we accounted for ourselves following a 3-1 start.  There were far too many long Sundays over the last three quarters of the season, with today’s loss in Houston being the final example, and that cannot repeat itself in 2019.  That’s my message to our football people and players, but also our sponsors and fans, both of whom were remarkable."

Does, that have any bearing on what you would do to achieve quicker results?  Would a rookie starting and going 7-9 be good enough to retain your job? Do you have multiple years to develop someone and get it right?  Maybe I’m reading into that bolded part too much.  Was just wondering if your jobs were on the line if the same answers would be given.  I know I’ve been pro Foles since the end of the season, but I’ve had that statement in the back of my mind as well.  I’m not trying to sway anyone by any means.  Ive enjoyed reading the discussion on this topic.  And curious how Shads patience could influence the decision, if any.

I most likely wouldn't be in this mess if I was TC/DC because I would have passed on Fournette and picked Mahomes or Watson.