(01-18-2019, 02:14 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(01-18-2019, 12:47 PM)TJBender Wrote: I don't think the TSA should've existed in the first place, nor do I think we should be spending billions of dollars on low-powered microwave ovens to see through people's clothes when there's all kinds of evidence out there that security is less effective today than it was on 9/10/2001. The microwave ovens wouldn't have detected the box cutters used on 9/11, and I think we've all seen firsthand the result of sourcing your high-security workforce off of Craigslist and advertisements on pizza boxes.

But I digress. The TSA never should have been founded to begin with. The only good they've done was provide me with loads of laughs and great stories from when I was but a wee businessman who constantly arrived at the airport early enough to screw with them for a few minutes (or, in Newark, 33 minutes) before getting on my way.

(01-18-2019, 02:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: Prove it.

---

I think I'd be happier here, thanks.

Your proof is a Nate Silver poll. Enough said...

Silver's final analysis before election day gave Hillary a 2 in 3 chance of winning the Presidency.  Everyone else had her 9 in 10 or better.  Trump getting elected was something of a fluke, with margins of around 10,000 voters in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.  He doesn't win without those states.  Polling is still a very inexact science, but no one does it better than Silver.

---