https://draftwire.usatoday.com/2019/02/0...er-murray/

We would probably have to give up a 2nd to ensure we get our guy, but TBH I am unsure if I like giving up a 2 and a future pick to move up to 4, though based on last year's Jets-Colts trade, that makes some sense.

I'm thinking perhaps the compensation should be a little less considering the picks in question are a little lower, this is not viewed as strong a QB class as last year and there is less demand at the top for QBs this year.

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

If the Jaguars love Haskins and they don't have to give up next year's first pick, this would be a great deal. They'd still need to pick up a veteran "bridge" quarterback who won't be too costly (not Foles) to start next season. Despite giving up this year's 2nd rounder, the Jags can still get solid players in rounds 3 and 4 to address needs at tight end, wide receiver and offensive line. With the money they're saving on not paying Foles, they can also fill needs at these positions.

---

If the Jaguars love Haskins and they don't have to give up next year's first pick, this would be a great deal. They'd still need to pick up a veteran "bridge" quarterback who won't be too costly (not Foles) to start next season. Despite giving up this year's 2nd rounder, the Jags can still get solid players in rounds 3 and 4 to address needs at tight end, wide receiver and offensive line. With the money they're saving on not paying Foles, they can also fill needs at these positions.

I would just keep Blake as the "bridge".

---

Man, I can't say I'm a big fan of the picks in 3 and 4

I kinda prefer Oakland's picks of White and Montgomery in our two spots, and then grab one of the other QB, or live with a band aid free agent till next season.

---

https://draftwire.usatoday.com/2019/02/0...er-murray/

We would probably have to give up a 2nd to ensure we get our guy, but TBH I am unsure if I like giving up a 2 and a future pick to move up to 4, though based on last year's Jets-Colts trade, that makes some sense.

I'm thinking perhaps the compensation should be a little less considering the picks in question are a little lower, this is not viewed as strong a QB class as last year and there is less demand at the top for QBs this year.

Other than the Jalen Jelks pick, (which I don't like), I'd be pretty happy with this draft. I obviously love the Haskins pick and I really like the Bobby Evans selection as well. Personally, I see a lot better options at WR than Lodge though, but i could live with it. Jelks is not a good pass rusher though. He's been a disappointment.

---

If the Jaguars love Haskins and they don't have to give up next year's first pick, this would be a great deal. They'd still need to pick up a veteran "bridge" quarterback who won't be too costly (not Foles) to start next season. Despite giving up this year's 2nd rounder, the Jags can still get solid players in rounds 3 and 4 to address needs at tight end, wide receiver and offensive line. With the money they're saving on not paying Foles, they can also fill needs at these positions.

I would just keep Blake as the "bridge".

No.

---

https://draftwire.usatoday.com/2019/02/0...er-murray/

We would probably have to give up a 2nd to ensure we get our guy, but TBH I am unsure if I like giving up a 2 and a future pick to move up to 4, though based on last year's Jets-Colts trade, that makes some sense.

I'm thinking perhaps the compensation should be a little less considering the picks in question are a little lower, this is not viewed as strong a QB class as last year and there is less demand at the top for QBs this year.

Other than the Jalen Jelks pick, (which I don't like), I'd be pretty happy with this draft. I obviously love the Haskins pick and I really like the Bobby Evans selection as well. Personally, I see a lot better options at WR than Lodge though, but i could live with it. Jelks is not a good pass rusher though. He's been a disappointment.

---

I would just keep Blake as the "bridge".

No.

He makes the most sense financially and he is going to be with a new OC who is known for maximizing his QBs potential.

---

Other than the Jalen Jelks pick, (which I don't like), I'd be pretty happy with this draft. I obviously love the Haskins pick and I really like the Bobby Evans selection as well. Personally, I see a lot better options at WR than Lodge though, but i could live with it. Jelks is not a good pass rusher though. He's been a disappointment.

---

No.

He makes the most sense financially and he is going to be with a new OC who is known for maximizing his QBs potential.

Nah.

He gone.

---