(03-12-2019, 07:23 PM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(03-12-2019, 06:07 PM)JackCity Wrote: Foles is not severely limited and is undoubtedly better than Blake

I won't pretend to have watched him play enough football to know what his limits are, but the "experts" are laughing at the jaguars and the massive contact they gave Foles. My guess is the team won't have the kind of injuries they did this year, so there will be a lot of crowing about how much better Foles is than Bortles as he leads the team to 8 or 9 wins, but in my opinion he has to win a Superbowl here, and I don't see it happening with a guy like him that has always failed as a long term starter. Hopefully he can prove that history wrong.

They'd laugh at any move we make. example:

"I can't believe they signed Foles for that high a price ahahahahahaha"
"I can't believe they're sticking with Bortles hahahahahha"
"I can't believe they're going with Bridgewater, he's not even as good as Bortles hahahahaha"
"I can't believe they're wasting that Defense by going with a rookie QB, they'll never win with a rookie ahahahahah"

Like they could somehow come away with Tom Brady and the news would still be negative; they only know how to bash and badmouth the Jaguars. These "experts" do the laziest research when it comes to our team. If Foles had gone to Miami on the exact same contract they'd be hooting and hollering about what a great signing it was, what a bargain for a SB MVP etc. it's a doublestandard.

---