Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Nancy Pelosi rules out Trump impeachment: ‘He’s not worth it’

#17
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2019, 12:33 PM by B2hibry.)

(03-12-2019, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(03-12-2019, 07:33 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: Because there are no grounds for impeachment.  He hasn't broken the law or violated any ethics rules.  It's not like he's done anything near what President Clinton did.

There are plenty of grounds for impeachment.
The emoluments alone!
They never proved that Clinton got an emolument while in office. But can you imagine if Obama or Bush had been literally operating a hotel targeting foreign diplomats while in office? 
Nancy just doesn't see high enough chances of winning in the Senate, nor does she see that the chances of her getting other things she wants improve with Pence in the White House. Remember Nancy generally has access to the unredacted versions of things. So she probably knows a little bit more about what facts are left to reveal, and when they will be revealed, than the rest of us. What's left to reveal is either not that surprising, or the schedule that it could possibly be revealed is too close to the 2020 election.

There are "plenty of grounds" and then you spout Emoluments Clause? It's a stretch to believe anything of unlawful merit comes from the Emolument case, let alone define grounds for impeachment. Little to no precedents and he has shown to distance himself (personal) from the fair market transactions taking place.

Again, another great leap in believing Nancy is backing off because she doesn't like the alternative. As you say, she has access to the info and knows there isn't anything there. This is reinforced by the fact that she agreed to hire two attorney's to guide the recent rash of hearings. If it doesn't exist, make it exist!! Unlucky for her and the Dem house is that there is no legal standing for any of the 81 entities contacted for info and hearings to have to comply. There are no lawful investigation grounds. In any case, muddying the waters was part of the plan from the beginning...dirty the air for the 2020 election in hopes that the sheep will bite. Only, she failed to let the newer members of her circus in on the plan. Seems to be backfiring at the moment and making her the fool.
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Nancy Pelosi rules out Trump impeachment: ‘He’s not worth it’ - by B2hibry - 03-13-2019, 11:10 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!