Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Poll: Choose a position priority for the draft:
TE, OL, WR , RB2
OL, TE, WR, RB2
OL, TE, RB2, WR
TE, OL, FS, WR
OL, TE, FS, WR
TE, OL, WR, FS
other
corn
Blank #2
[Show Results]
 
 
Draft Priority by Position

#1

This keeps popping up in several threads, so I figured it can have it's own discussion. 

Tell us how you prioritize the team's needs in the draft. Feel free to update and alter responses as we add players in FA.

Obviously the possibilities are vast in number , so poll options are limited.
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply

#2

Definitely go with TE, OL, WR, and RB2. Foles works well with a really good TE in the mix. I think that needs to be top priority in Rd 1.
Let's Get Em!!!! Go Jags!
Reply

#3

(03-15-2019, 10:42 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: This keeps popping up in several threads, so I figured it can have it's own discussion. 

Tell us how you prioritize the team's needs in the draft. Feel free to update and alter responses as we add players in FA.

Obviously the possibilities are vast in number , so poll options are limited.

What I THINK will happen:

1.  RT 
2.  TE
3.  RB

What I kind of want to happen

1.  TE
2.  RT
3.  TE or OL
3b  TE or OL

What I am afraid of happening

1.  Rashan Gary
2.  S
3.  OT
[Image: giphy.gif]

Another day on the Jaguars Message Board...
Welcome to Jacksonville:  "We don't deal with carnival folk."




Reply

#4

(03-15-2019, 12:35 PM)Bullseye Wrote:
(03-15-2019, 10:42 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: This keeps popping up in several threads, so I figured it can have it's own discussion. 

Tell us how you prioritize the team's needs in the draft. Feel free to update and alter responses as we add players in FA.

Obviously the possibilities are vast in number , so poll options are limited.

What I THINK will happen:

1.  RT 
2.  TE
3.  RB

What I kind of want to happen

1.  TE
2.  RT
3.  TE or OL
3b  TE or OL

What I am afraid of happening

1.  Rashan Gary
2.  S
3.  OT

Samesies, so i voted for corn just to be dificult.
Reply

#5

1st Round: Taylor/Hockenson
I'd be happy with either.

2nd Round: Lindstrom/Fant/Little/Risner
Grab the top OL left.

3rd round: Dawson Knox/Jace Sternberger
If we don't go TE 1st/2nd I like this duo in the 3rd.
Reply

#6
(This post was last modified: 03-15-2019, 12:54 PM by JagJohn.)

Although, thats not really the question I suppose. As for our needs, if we ignore value of different positions and just say which positions currently have the lowest rated players in them, I would say it goes TE, RT, FS, RG, RB2, WR, LB.
Reply

#7

shoulda voted corn.

TE, OL, (WR/backup QB)

parenthetical can change order but both go in the 3rd.
Reply

#8

(03-15-2019, 12:45 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: 1st Round: Taylor/Hockenson
I'd be happy with either.

2nd Round: Lindstrom/Fant/Little/Risner
Grab the top OL left.

3rd round: Dawson Knox/Jace Sternberger
If we don't go TE 1st/2nd I like this duo in the 3rd.
If you were guaranteed the following, which scenario would you choose:

1. RD1- Hockenson. RD2- Risner.
2. RD1- Taylor. RD2- Fant.
3. RD 1- Quinen Williams. RD2- Paris Campbell.
Reply

#9

(03-15-2019, 01:14 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(03-15-2019, 12:45 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: 1st Round: Taylor/Hockenson
I'd be happy with either.

2nd Round: Lindstrom/Fant/Little/Risner
Grab the top OL left.

3rd round: Dawson Knox/Jace Sternberger
If we don't go TE 1st/2nd I like this duo in the 3rd.
If you were guaranteed the following, which scenario would you choose:

1. RD1- Hockenson. RD2- Risner.
2. RD1- Taylor. RD2- Fant.
3. RD 1- Quinen Williams. RD2- Paris Campbell.

option #1 for this guy
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply

#10

(03-15-2019, 01:14 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(03-15-2019, 12:45 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: 1st Round: Taylor/Hockenson
I'd be happy with either.

2nd Round: Lindstrom/Fant/Little/Risner
Grab the top OL left.

3rd round: Dawson Knox/Jace Sternberger
If we don't go TE 1st/2nd I like this duo in the 3rd.
If you were guaranteed the following, which scenario would you choose:

1. RD1- Hockenson. RD2- Risner.
2. RD1- Taylor. RD2- Fant.
3. RD 1- Quinen Williams. RD2- Paris Campbell.

A million times over option 2 - absolute dream draft is anything where Fant falls to the second for us.
Reply

#11
(This post was last modified: 03-15-2019, 01:41 PM by BlueEyedJag.)

(03-15-2019, 01:14 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(03-15-2019, 12:45 PM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: 1st Round: Taylor/Hockenson
I'd be happy with either.

2nd Round: Lindstrom/Fant/Little/Risner
Grab the top OL left.

3rd round: Dawson Knox/Jace Sternberger
If we don't go TE 1st/2nd I like this duo in the 3rd.
If you were guaranteed the following, which scenario would you choose:

1. RD1- Hockenson. RD2- Risner.
2. RD1- Taylor. RD2- Fant.
3. RD 1- Quinen Williams. RD2- Paris Campbell.

Given those 3 options...first reaction is option 2. Complete the OL pretty much and get a playmaker TE. While option 1 does the same I like Taylor over Risner a lot more than I like Hock over Fant.

Q. Williams is probably the best player but WR value just not there for me for option 3. Campbell is a good player but with that option you don't have a RT/TE/RG...could maybe find 2 of those in round 3 but finding 3 possible starters would be really hard.

If the draft did fall something like that I'd grab Q. Williams if no one wanted to trade down. I think he can be extremely dominant moreso than Taylor at his position.

2nd round give me Fant for sure.

3rd: Hope some of then OL prospects fall
Reply

#12

TE is the biggest need by far.

RT is a bigger need than WR2/3, but WR is a bigger need overall than OL.

We're one good player short of a good oline, we're at least 2 good players short of a good WR corps.
Reply

#13

(03-15-2019, 01:35 PM)Upper Wrote: TE is the biggest need by far.

RT is a bigger need than WR2/3, but WR is a bigger need overall than OL.

We're one good player short of a good oline, we're at least 2 good players short of a good WR corps.

We need Chark to really take strides but Dede/Chark isn't that bad and hopefully Lee can give us something.  Maybe Cole can learn to hold onto the ball again with a more accurate QB.
Reply

#14
(This post was last modified: 03-15-2019, 02:35 PM by TheO-LineMatters.)

my opinion
RG
TE
OT
WR
FS
ILB
DE (replace Fowler)
RB

What I think we will do.....
TE
WR
OT
FS
RB
OG
QB
Reply

#15

(03-15-2019, 01:35 PM)Upper Wrote: TE is the biggest need by far.

RT is a bigger need than WR2/3, but WR is a bigger need overall than OL.

We're one good player short of a good oline, we're at least 2 good players short of a good WR corps.

We know you dont really value the olineman, you never really have.  Cann is far from good.
Reply

#16

(03-15-2019, 02:30 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:
(03-15-2019, 01:35 PM)Upper Wrote: TE is the biggest need by far.

RT is a bigger need than WR2/3, but WR is a bigger need overall than OL.

We're one good player short of a good oline, we're at least 2 good players short of a good WR corps.

We know you dont really value the olineman, you never really have.  Cann is far from good.

No he's not, but they just gave him a multi year mid starter level salary deal. He's going to be starting at RG.
Reply

#17

(03-15-2019, 01:35 PM)Upper Wrote: TE is the biggest need by far.

RT is a bigger need than WR2/3, but WR is a bigger need overall than OL.

We're one good player short of a good oline, we're at least 2 good players short of a good WR corps.

I disagree, I think we are just one big-bodied X Receiver type away from feeling quite happy with the WR group.
Reply

#18

TE, OL, FS, WR. Trade back and pick up TE and OL. FS and WR is a toss up depending on if Byron murphy is available.
Season Tix, Section 409

 
Reply

#19

TE and OL could be interchangeable

However I gotta think with the Cann signing and the Richardson pick that OL takes a back seat to a playmaker at the TE position. Where we currently have Koyack and Swaim.

I picked TE, OL, WR, RB2

Which is essentially how I think the draft will go, with OL and TE maybe switching if we trade back, and WR and RB could be both round 2 picks interchangeably, imo, based on value of who is available.


Wildcard though... is despite what our "greatest need" may be.... this front office may select a defensive player in the first round, perhaps even DL, based on the amount of talent and the "depth" at positions that we have greater needs at
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply

#20

(03-15-2019, 03:01 PM)JagJohn Wrote:
(03-15-2019, 01:35 PM)Upper Wrote: TE is the biggest need by far.

RT is a bigger need than WR2/3, but WR is a bigger need overall than OL.

We're one good player short of a good oline, we're at least 2 good players short of a good WR corps.

I disagree, I think we are just one big-bodied X Receiver type away from feeling quite happy with the WR group.

If it's a true dominant WR1 like Metcalf at 7 then sure that + Dede + whatever we get from Chark/Cole/Lee could be quite good. If it's Dede + the enigma trio + a mid round WR then we're going to be in trouble.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!