Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
** The Official 2019-2020 Dem Debate Thread **

#86

(06-30-2019, 03:28 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(06-30-2019, 12:43 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: As others have pointed out, Trump gets results, and they are not the same as his demands. That's negotiation. Maybe not the way you think negotiation should be done, but it works. Do you think the Obama method of giving Iran everything they wanted and then more is the proper way to negotiate? Or maybe just ignoring the Europeans' failure to reach military spending as promised in the NATO treaty is proper negotiation?

Nobody knows the totality of what Iran's negotiators wanted in 2015, besides the people who were in the room.
A claim that they got everything they wanted is tantamount to a claim to know everything that they wanted, which is way beyond what any of us can say.

The rest of your post has similarly, but less obviously, wrong presumptions.

That's a pathetic argument. If Iran had asked the US to turn over all of its nuclear weapons to the Ayatollah and execute every American non-Muslim you would be technically correct. You should have learned that "technically correct" has been refuted as a reasonable argument during the Concentration Camp discussion. 

But if I need to spell it out for you (and I wasn't addressing you) let's just say that Iran got everything they could reasonably expect, and more. They got back all of the money being held, sanctions ended, the right to enrich uranium, the right to build a nuclear weapon after ten years and no inspections by the US to verify that they wouldn't be building one before that. Right there is more than any sane person would give them. Then they got an additional pallet of cash as ransom payment.




                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: ** The Official 2019-2020 Dem Debate Thread ** - by MalabarJag - 06-30-2019, 04:49 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!